Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Impact of COVID-19 care reorganization on the prognosis of patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma: a multicentric retrospective study

Marie Chaumel1, Nicolas Brichart2, Franck Bruyère1, Ali Bourgi1,*

1 Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours (CHRU Tours), 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours Cedex 9, 37044, France
2 Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Régional d’Orléans (CHR Orléans), 14 Avenue de l’Hôpital, Orléans, 45100, France

* Corresponding Author: Ali Bourgi. Email: email

Canadian Journal of Urology 2025, 32(4), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.066470

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems globally, raising concerns about delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment. In France, transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) was prioritized in national urology guidelines to ensure the timely management of urothelial carcinoma. This study aimed to assess the impact of care reorganization on tumor staging, recurrence, palliative care, and mortality in bladder cancer patients from the pre-pandemic through late-pandemic periods. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including all patients who underwent TURBT with histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma between April and December of 2019 (pre-pandemic), 2020 (early pandemic), 2021 (mid-pandemic), and 2022 (late pandemic) in two French institutions. TURBT indications were categorized as diagnostic, palliative, or staging. Clinical and pathological data were compared across the four periods. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests, Estimated Annual Percentage Change (EAPC), and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, ASA score, and center. Results: A total of 790 TURBT procedures were analyzed. The proportion of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT ≥ 2) declined over time (18.7% in 2019 to 13.2% in 2022; p = 0.63), while superficial tumors (pTa) increased (57.2% to 65.5%). All-cause mortality significantly decreased from 38.0% in 2019 to 22.0% in 2020, 20.5% in 2021, and 19.5% in 2022 (p = 0.006). EAPC showed a significant annual decline in mortality (–24.3%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, 2020, 2021, and 2022 were each associated with significantly lower odds of mortality compared to 2019. Recurrence rates remained stable across all periods (p = 0.93). Inter-hospital variation persisted in mortality and recurrence. Conclusions: Despite the pandemic, urothelial bladder cancer outcomes did not worsen through 2022. On the contrary, timely reorganization, prioritization of TURBT, and triage strategies were associated with reduced mortality and palliative care needs, highlighting the resilience of cancer care when guided by adaptive health policies.

Keywords

urothelial carcinoma; bladder tumor; transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT); COVID-19; pandemic; cancer prognosis; mortality; recurrence

Cite This Article

APA Style
Chaumel, M., Brichart, N., Bruyère, F., Bourgi, A. (2025). Impact of COVID-19 care reorganization on the prognosis of patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma: a multicentric retrospective study. Canadian Journal of Urology, 32(4), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.066470
Vancouver Style
Chaumel M, Brichart N, Bruyère F, Bourgi A. Impact of COVID-19 care reorganization on the prognosis of patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma: a multicentric retrospective study. Can J Urology. 2025;32(4):359–366. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.066470
IEEE Style
M. Chaumel, N. Brichart, F. Bruyère, and A. Bourgi, “Impact of COVID-19 care reorganization on the prognosis of patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma: a multicentric retrospective study,” Can. J. Urology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 359–366, 2025. https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.066470



cc Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 616

    View

  • 449

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link