Open Access
REVIEW
Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Sustainable Agriculture: Mechanisms and Applications
Key Laboratory of Applied Ecology of Loess Plateau, Yan’an University, Yan’an, China
* Corresponding Author: Xiukang Wang. Email:
(This article belongs to the Special Issue: Plant Physiological and Molecular Responses to Coupled Water-Nutrient Management: Towards Climate-Resilient Crops)
Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany 2026, 95(4), 3 https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.078974
Received 12 January 2026; Accepted 27 February 2026; Issue published 28 April 2026
Abstract
Rhizosphere microorganisms, as crucial biological groups at the soil–plant interface, play a significant role in advancing sustainable agriculture. This review systematically synthesizes three decades of research to elucidate the mechanisms and applications of rhizosphere microbes—including nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms, and plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)—in enhancing soil health, improving crop stress tolerance, and optimizing ecosystem functioning. Key findings indicate that replacing 50% of synthetic nitrogen with organic fertilizer in maize–wheat rotation systems can reduce nitrous oxide emissions by up to 68% in loamy soils. Long-term no-till systems enhance carbon sequestration through microbial-driven soil organic matter accumulation. Under controlled stress conditions in greenhouse trials, microbial inoculants increase drought and salinity tolerance in tomato and rice by 50%. Modern molecular tools such as CRISPR-edited nitrogen-fixers and nano-encapsulation techniques improve microbial survival under stress by up to 68%, while tailored microbial inoculants boost crop yields by 12–40%. Case studies highlight the efficacy of synergistic microbial consortia in promoting nutrient cycling and suppressing pathogens. However, challenges remain in the field stability of microbial inoculants, low survival rates—especially below 20% in arid or acidic soils—and regulatory frameworks lag behind technological advances. Future research should prioritize developing scalable microbial technologies, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and refining policy frameworks to promote the widespread adoption of biofertilizers, thereby aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Zero Hunger and Climate Action. Effective implementation of rhizosphere engineering offers a viable pathway to translate laboratory breakthroughs into global agricultural systems, ensuring food security while mitigating environmental degradation.Keywords
Sustainable agriculture is a cornerstone strategy for balancing global food security with environmental stewardship amidst escalating climate challenges and anthropogenic pressures [1]. Central to this paradigm is the rhizosphere microbiome—a dynamic consortium of bacteria, fungi, and archaea that colonizes the soil–plant interface. These microorganisms orchestrate essential agroecological processes through symbiotic relationships with plant roots [2], directly influencing nutrient acquisition, stress resilience [3], and overall soil ecosystem function [4].
The root-associated microbiota is typically dominated by Proteobacteria (~50%), Actinobacteria (~10%), Firmicutes (~10%), and Bacteroidetes (~10%), and exhibits notable host-specific structuring. In contrast, the broader rhizosphere maintains greater phylogenetic diversity, supporting a wide range of ecological roles [5]. By decomposing organic matter and solubilizing mineral nutrients, rhizosphere microbes enhance phosphorus availability by 20–30% and improve nitrogen-use efficiency through symbiotic fixation pathways [6]. They also activate systemic resistance against pathogens via phytohormone modulation (e.g., jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling) and antibiotic production, reducing disease incidence by 40–70% [7]. Furthermore, microbial synthesis of osmoprotectants and modulation of root architecture improve crop tolerance to drought and salinity [8]. Through biofilm formation and polysaccharide secretion, these organisms enhance soil aggregate stability by 15–25% in loam soils, as evidenced by meta-analyses of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculations [9]. Additionally, they contribute to the degradation of agricultural pollutants, including a 60–90% reduction in pesticide residues via enzymatic detoxification [10].
Recent advances in molecular tools have revolutionized our ability to harness these microbial communities. High-throughput sequencing and metagenomics now allow precise mapping of microbial consortium dynamics across diverse soil types and management regimes [11]. Meanwhile, CRISPR-based engineering of nitrogen-fixing bacteria has increased symbiotic efficiency by 1.5-fold in non-leguminous crops [12]. Field trials demonstrate that tailored microbial inoculants can raise crop yields by 12–40% while reducing synthetic fertilizer inputs by 30–50%, resulting in carbon footprints 2.3 times lower than conventional practices [13].
Despite these advances, translational challenges remain. Heterogeneous field conditions often reduce inoculant efficacy, with survival rates falling below 20% in arid or acidic soils [14]. Regulatory frameworks also lag behind technological innovation; only about 15% of characterized PGPR strains have been commercialized worldwide [15,16].
Previous reviews have laid important foundations for understanding rhizosphere microbiomes. Early work focused on specific microbial groups such as nitrogen-fixing rhizobia [17] and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria [18], clarifying their roles in nutrient cycling. The advent of molecular tools prompted a paradigm shift, with meta-analyses revealing microbial community responses to climate stressors [19] and agronomic practices [20]. More recent reviews have highlighted the co-evolution of plants and root-associated microbes [21,22] and the agronomic potential of PGPR [23]. However, many of these studies compartmentalize microbial functions (e.g., treating biological nitrogen fixation separately from disease suppression) or emphasize theoretical frameworks over practical application.
In contrast, this review connects discrete microbial traits—such as siderophore production or 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity—to field-scale outcomes, including yield increases of 12–40% under microbial inoculation [24] and reductions in synthetic fertilizer dependence by 30–50% [25]. Unlike reviews focused solely on yield optimization, we emphasize triple-win solutions: enhancing food security [26], mitigating climate change [27], and restoring soil health—exemplified by a 15–25% improvement in aggregate stability through biofilm formation [28].
Acknowledging the persistent gap between laboratory discoveries and field implementation, we propose actionable strategies such as nano-encapsulation to improve microbial survival [29], CRISPR-engineered inoculants [12], and policy frameworks to promote biofertilizer adoption in developing regions.
This review integrates three decades of research to present a coherent roadmap for rhizosphere engineering in sustainable agriculture. We highlight: (1) Synergistic combinations of nitrogen fixers (e.g., Azospirillum), phosphate solubilizers (e.g., Pseudomonas), and biocontrol agents (e.g., Trichoderma) that improve field adaptability. (2) Nano-encapsulation techniques that increase microbial survival from 14% to 68% under drought stress [30]. (3) pathways to align microbial biotechnology with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Zero Hunger and Climate Action. By clarifying the mechanisms and scalable applications of rhizosphere engineering, this work provides a practical guide for translating laboratory breakthroughs into landscape-level agricultural sustainability.
2 Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure
The rhizosphere microbiome represents a critical interface for plant-environment interactions, with emerging evidence highlighting its pivotal role in sustainable agricultural systems (Fig. 1). Advances in analytical methodologies have transformed our understanding of these microbial communities, particularly under abiotic stress. Recent studies in summer maize systems reported a 51.7% reduction in aboveground biomass under combined drought–heat stress, alongside a 34.5% decrease in root biomass and a significant enrichment of stress-responsive Gemmatimonadota [31]. While these shifts suggest adaptive microbial strategies—such as potential enhancement of nitrogen assimilation via L-valine secretion—mechanistic causality remains to be fully elucidated, highlighting the need for controlled experiments to define functional roles.
Figure 1: Schematic of rhizosphere microbial taxonomy and functional networks.
Modern molecular techniques have largely overcome the limitations of traditional culture-based methods [32]. For example, high-throughput sequencing—such as Illumina-based 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing [33,34]—coupled with advanced bioinformatics tools [35], now enables precise monitoring of microbial community shifts under different agricultural practices. Although older techniques like PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) are still useful for rapid fingerprinting of microbial diversity [36], metagenomic sequencing [37] provides deeper insights into the functional gene repertoire of the rhizosphere microbiome. Furthermore, innovative cultivation strategies based on ribosomal RNA operon copy number [34] are now emerging to close the microbial cultivation gap and expand the reservoir of strains for bioinoculant development.
Environmental factors play a decisive role in shaping rhizosphere community architecture through complex, interacting mechanisms (Fig. 2). Soil physicochemical parameters exert primary control; for example, moisture fluctuations can reduce bacterial richness by 15% under variable wetting regimes [38], and pH strongly influences phosphatase activity. Organic matter content is another key modulator, boosting microbial abundance by up to 30% via nutrient supply [39]. Notably, soil multifunctionality correlates strongly with microbial network complexity across soil profiles [40], underscoring the importance of soil health in agricultural sustainability.
Figure 2: Multifactorial drivers shaping rhizosphere microbial community structure and function.
Plant–microbe interactions are central to rhizosphere engineering strategies. Corn seedlings co-inoculated with root exudates and Azospirillum brasilense Ab-V5 showed a 50% expansion in root area and a 19% increase in bacterial enrichment [41], demonstrating the potential for targeted microbial recruitment. Root exudate-mediated chemoattraction [42] facilitates the establishment of beneficial consortia that improve nutrient acquisition and stress resilience [43]. Growth-stage-dependent exudation patterns [44] further enable dynamic microbial adjustments to environmental stressors, particularly under phosphorus or nitrogen limitation.
Microbial community dynamics are governed by complex interaction networks with direct agricultural relevance. For instance, an airlift partial nitritation-anammox system achieved 95.1% nitrogen removal efficiency at optimal C/N ratios [45], illustrating how microbial synergies can enhance nutrient cycling. Competitive exclusion and symbiotic cooperation [46] drive community succession, with mycorrhizal associations offering particular promise for improving soil structure [47]. There is also emerging evidence that microbial consortia can adapt to climate extremes; drought-tolerant communities, for example, increased soil organic carbon by 12% in maize systems [48,49].
The rhizosphere microbiome functions as an integrated, self-regulating system where environmental parameters, plant physiology, and microbial ecology converge (Table 1). Key operational mechanisms include optimizing nutrient cycling via enzymatic activity modulation, transmitting stress signals through phytohormone networks, suppressing pathogens through competitive exclusion, and enhancing soil structure via polysaccharide production. Together, these functions position rhizosphere engineering as a cornerstone of sustainable agricultural intensification.
Table 1: Dynamic interactions among soil characteristics, plant root exudates, and microbial communities, along with their interrelationships.
| Category | Subcategory | Description | Quantitative Impact on Microbial Community | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil Properties | pH | Measure of soil acidity or alkalinity, typically ranging from 4.5 to 8.0 in most soils. | Acidobacteria abundance increases by 20–30% in acidic soils (pH < 5.5). Actinobacteria dominate in neutral to alkaline soils (pH 6.5–8.0), comprising 30–40% of total taxa. | [50] |
| Organic Matter Content | Percentage of decomposed plant/animal residues in soil (1–10% in agricultural soils). | Organic matter ↑1% → Microbial biomass carbon ↑5–10%. Carbon utilization efficiency ↑15–20% under high organic matter. | [51] | |
| Nutrient Availability | Levels of N, P, K, and micronutrients (e.g., available N: 10–50 mg/L). | Nitrogen-fixing bacteria abundance ↑2–3-fold under P-sufficient conditions. Competitive exclusion reduces pathogen populations by 15–20% under nutrient limitation. | [52] | |
| Soil Texture | Sand/silt/clay proportions (e.g., loam: 40% sand, 40% silt, 20% clay). | Clay soils ↑1.5–2× microbial biomass vs. sandy soils due to nutrient retention. Porosity ↓30% in sandy soils → Reduced microbial habitat diversity. | [40] | |
| Moisture Content | Water content (10–30% in most soils). | Optimal moisture (20–25%) → Enzyme activity ↑2–3×Anaerobic zones expand at >30% moisture → Methanogen abundance ↑50%. | [8] | |
| Plant Root Exudates | Types of Exudates | Sugars, amino acids, organic acids, vitamins, secondary metabolites. | Flavonoids attract rhizobia → Nodulation ↑40–50% in legumes. Citric acid secretion by plants enhances P solubilization by 2–5×. | [32] |
| Concentration | Varies with plant species/stage (5–20 mg/g root fresh weight/day). | Exudate concentration ↑2× → Microbial population density ↑30–40% in rhizosphere hotspots. Selective pressure favors copiotrophs (e.g., Pseudomonas) over oligotrophs. | [12] | |
| Functionality | Roles in nutrient solubilization, signaling, and antimicrobial activity. | Siderophore-producing microbes ↑1.5–2× under Fe-limitation. Antibiotic-producing bacteria reduce pathogen viability by 60–80%. | [7] | |
| Microbial Populations | Bacterial Diversity | Dominant phyla: Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria. | Proteobacteria dominate (30–50%) in agricultural soils. Actinobacteria ↑10–15% in undisturbed soils vs. tilled soils. | [53] |
| Fungal Diversity | Includes mycorrhizal fungi (e.g., Glomus), saprophytes, and pathogens. | AMF colonization ↑20–40% under low-P conditions. Pathogenic fungi (e.g., Fusarium) abundance ↓30–40% with biocontrol agents. | [54] | |
| Archaea | Low-abundance but critical for N cycling (e.g., Nitrososphaera). | Ammonia-oxidizing archaea ↑1.2–1.5× in fertilized soils vs. unfertilized soils. | [55] | |
| Functional Groups | Nitrogen fixers, decomposers, pathogens, mutualists. | Denitrifiers reduce N2O emissions by 68% under organic amendments. PGPR ↑ plant growth by 12–40% through hormone production. | [56] | |
| Interactions | Soil-Plant-Microbe | Feedback loops between soil properties, root exudates, and microbial communities. | Mycorrhizal networks ↑ nutrient uptake efficiency by 20–30%. Microbial diversity ↑15–20% under intercropping vs. monoculture. | [45] |
| Competition & Cooperation | Resource competition vs. mutualistic interactions (e.g., cross-feeding). | Competitive exclusion reduces dominant taxa by 15–20%. Synergistic networks ↑ community resilience by 30–40% under stress. | [14] | |
| Plant-Microbe Signaling | Chemical signaling (e.g., flavonoids, Nod factors). | Symbiotic N fixation ↑2–3× with compatible rhizobia. Jasmonic acid signaling induces systemic resistance, reducing disease incidence by 40–60%. | [57] | |
| Environmental Stressors | Drought, salinity, pollutants alter soil properties and microbial dynamics. | Drought ↓ microbial biomass by 20–30% and activity by 40–50%. Salt stress reduces microbial diversity by 10–15% in saline soils. | [38] |
Current applications focus on developing bioinoculants for specific stress tolerance, implementing precision microbiome management through farming practices, enhancing carbon sequestration via microbial consortia, and optimizing nutrient-use efficiency. Future research should prioritize understanding eco-evolutionary feedbacks under climate change [58] and developing predictive models for plant–microbe–environment interactions. Integrating multi-omics approaches with agronomic evaluations will be essential to translate insights from microbial ecology into field-scale applications, ultimately realizing the potential of microbiome-driven sustainable agriculture.
3 Rhizosphere Growth-Promoting Microorganism
Rhizosphere growth-promoting microorganisms are vital drivers of sustainable agriculture, orchestrating multifaceted interactions with plant root systems (Fig. 3). Their mechanisms of action operate through three primary pathways: (1) enhancing nutrient assimilation and soil health, (2) regulating phytohormone biosynthesis and homeostasis, and (3) directly stimulating plant growth via hormone-mediated processes involving gibberellins, auxins, and cytokinins [59]. These microbes synthesize and degrade plant hormones such as auxins and gibberellins, while also producing regulatory compounds like choline and eugenol that optimize metabolic pathways in crops and woody plants through enhanced cell division and elongation [60]. For example, applying alginate oligosaccharides (2.5 g L−1) under moderate moisture conditions increased citrus yield by 15–20%, improved water use efficiency by 12–13%, and reduced irrigation demand by 620–700 m3 ha−1, demonstrating benefits for both crop productivity and soil health [61].
Figure 3: Mechanistic model of PGPR-mediated plant growth promotion and stress resilience.
PGPR exemplify these roles by decomposing organic matter to release nutrients, enhancing soil moisture retention and aeration, and increasing crop yields by up to 40% under abiotic stress [57]. Beyond nutrient provision, PGPR produce antimicrobial compounds that suppress soil-borne pathogens such as Phytophthora spp., reducing disease incidence by 60–70% [62]. However, their application requires caution due to potential risks of antibiotic resistance gene transfer to native microbiota, highlighting the need for long-term ecological assessments [63].
The rhizosphere microbiome further strengthens agroecosystem resilience by modulating root architecture through volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and optimizing photosynthetic efficiency via endogenous hormone regulation [64]. Microbial consortia, particularly within the Firmicutes and Pseudomonadota groups, exhibit dual functionality—stimulating plant growth while suppressing pathogens through metabolite production [63]. For instance, Pseudomonas sp. ST-TJ4 emits 1-undecene (75.97%), effectively inhibiting fungal pathogens and reducing root rot incidence by 70% [53].
Pathogen management remains a critical challenge, with fungal and nematode interactions posing significant threats. Omics technologies have advanced our understanding of fungal pathogenicity mechanisms—including toxin production and nutrient disruption—while also revealing the symbiotic potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [65]. Conversely, root-knot nematodes can be suppressed through eco-friendly biocontrol strategies using antagonistic microbes, which enhance systemic resistance and reduce crop losses by 40–50% [66].
Despite these advances, translating laboratory successes to field applications remains difficult. Heterogeneous soil conditions often reduce inoculant survival rates below 20%, and regulatory frameworks have not kept pace with microbial biotechnology innovations [67]. A key ecological barrier is colonization resistance: resident soil microbial communities, shaped by organic carbon chemistry, prime plant immunity and create biochemical barriers against introduced inoculants [68]. By harnessing the multifunctional roles of rhizosphere microorganisms, agriculture can achieve sustainable intensification that balances productivity with ecological stewardship. Future efforts should prioritize scalable microbial formulations, interdisciplinary research on plant–microbe–environment interactions, and policy integration to bridge the gap between discovery and implementation.
4 Microbial Regulation of Crop Nutrient Uptake
Rhizosphere microorganisms critically enhance crop nutrient acquisition, thereby supporting sustainable agricultural productivity (Fig. 4). Among these, nitrogen-fixing microbes convert atmospheric N2 into plant-available forms such as ammonia and nitrate. In legume systems, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and rhizodeposition significantly elevate soil nitrogen levels, a process functionally analogous to the general role of rhizosphere microbes in facilitating crop nutrient uptake [69]. Microbial transformations—including ammonification and nitrification—convert organic nitrogen into inorganic forms, contributing up to 144 kg N ha−1 from crop residues and an additional 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1 via biological nitrogen fixation [52]. Thus, these microorganisms directly supply nitrogen to plants while enhancing soil N availability and driving the nitrogen cycle.
Figure 4: Microbial-mediated pathways for enhanced crop nutrient acquisition. CNU, crops nutrient uptake; NFM, nitrogen-fixing microorganism; PSMs, phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms; ONE, other nutrient elements.
Beyond nitrogen, these microbes improve overall soil structure and fertility. Integrative application of organic and chemical fertilizers, including phosphorus-solubilizing agents like Trichoderma and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB), boosts yields in systems such as maize-wheat [70]. Microbial synthesis of organic compounds further stabilizes soil aggregates, improving aeration and stability. For example, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from Microcystis aeruginosa show high heavy-metal sorption capacity (44.81 mg g−1 for Ni2+ and 37.06 mg g−1 for Cu2+), illustrating a dual role in soil health and environmental remediation [71]. Additionally, through the production of bacteriocins and secondary metabolites, beneficial rhizosphere microbes inhibit pathogens and enhance crop resilience to abiotic stresses such as drought and heat [72]. Selected sugarcane rhizobacteria, for instance, exhibit substantial nitrogenase (up to 26.59 nmol C2H4 mg protein−1 h−1) and ACC deaminase activities (up to 75.63 μmol mg protein−1 h−1), underscoring their potential to improve growth, nutrient availability, and disease resistance [73].
Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms (PSB and fungi) increase soil phosphorus availability by converting insoluble forms into plant-accessible phosphate via acidolysis and enzymolysis [74]. Co-composting phosphate rocks with rhizosphere soil enhances labile P, correlated with activity of phosphate-solubilizing fungi and alkaline phosphatase (phoD) [75]. Inoculation with strains such as Pseudomonas moraviensis, Bacillus safensis, and Falsibacillus pallidus has been shown to increase wheat yield by up to 14.42%, raise labile soil P by >122%, and reduce stable P by 46.89% [76]. These microbes secrete organic acids and enzymes that solubilize nutrients and can form synergistic associations with plant roots, further improving P uptake [77].
Rhizosphere microbes also regulate micronutrient bioavailability. They enhance iron acquisition through siderophore production and facilitation of Fe3+ reduction, supporting biofortification strategies [78]. Siderophore-producing genera such as Rhizobium and Pseudomonas improve Fe and P availability under abiotic stress [24]. Similarly, zinc-solubilizing bacteria secrete metabolites that mobilize soil zinc, offering a sustainable biofortification pathway in Zn-deficient soils [79]. Copper and manganese uptake are also positively influenced: some bacteria modify copper oxidation states or activate Mn-detoxifying enzymes, increasing their plant-available forms [80].
Collectively, these microbial mechanisms—ranging from macro- and micronutrient solubilization to heavy-metal immobilization and stress mitigation—demonstrate the integral role of the rhizosphere microbiome in advancing nutrient-efficient, sustainable agriculture.
5 Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Plant Stress Mitigation: from Cellular Mechanisms to Field Resilience
Rhizosphere microorganisms play a pivotal role in protecting plants against abiotic and biotic stresses through a suite of cellular and molecular mechanisms. This section synthesizes current knowledge on how microbes themselves survive extreme conditions and how they, in turn, enhance plant stress tolerance at the tissue and cellular levels, particularly in roots.
Stress-adapted rhizobacteria and fungi employ multiple cellular strategies to withstand adverse environments: Alteration of membrane lipid composition (e.g., increased unsaturated fatty acids) maintains membrane fluidity under temperature extremes and osmotic stress. Production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) forms biofilms that retain water, chelate toxins, and create stable microhabitats. This mechanism is directly linked to the 15–25% improvement in soil aggregate stability reported in meta-analyses [81]. Accumulation of compatible solutes (e.g., K+, glutamate, trehalose, glycine betaine) balances osmotic pressure and stabilizes proteins under drought or salinity. Enhanced expression of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidases enables microbes to scavenge reactive oxygen species generated under stress.
Stress-tolerant microbes confer resilience to plants through direct and indirect mechanisms: Microbial biofilms stabilize soil aggregates around roots, improving water availability, aeration, and root penetration—a tissue-level environmental buffer. ACC deaminase produced by PGPR cleaves the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, reducing stress-induced ethylene accumulation in roots and preventing growth inhibition and senescence [82]. Simultaneously, microbial synthesis of auxins (IAA), cytokinins, and gibberellins promotes root elongation and branching. Stress-adapted phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and K-solubilizing bacteria continue to release organic acids and enzymes under low pH or moisture deficit, ensuring nutrient supply to root epidermal and cortical cells. Microbial elicitors (flagellin, lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycans) are perceived by root pattern-recognition receptors, triggering mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades and upregulation of defense-related genes. This priming leads to faster and stronger activation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) upon subsequent pathogen attack [83].
Linking these cellular mechanisms to agronomic performance, field trials demonstrate that microbial inoculants increase drought and salinity tolerance in tomato and rice by 50%, and nano-encapsulation improves survival from 14% to 68% under drought stress [29,84]. However, the establishment of introduced strains is often limited by colonization resistance—a phenomenon whereby resident soil organic carbon chemistry modulates plant immune status and the native microbiome, creating a barrier to exotic inoculants [85]. Future research must dissect the molecular dialogue between inoculants and resident communities to design synthetic consortia capable of overcoming this resistance.
6 Microbial Fertilizers in Agriculture
Rhizosphere microorganisms function as effective biofertilizers and play a crucial role in advancing sustainable agriculture (Fig. 5). Growing emphasis on environmental protection and sustainable farming has heightened interest in microbial fertilizers. The technology for their production continues to evolve. Traditional methods, which depend on cultivating selected strains and optimizing culture media, are limited by high costs and potential risks such as pest-transmitted microorganisms. To overcome these challenges, novel preparation approaches are being explored. Advances in genetic engineering have enabled the development of hyper-producing microbial strains that enhance biosurfactant synthesis and activity while lowering production costs [86]. Solid-state fermentation has emerged as a promising biofertilizer production method, reducing water use and substantially improving microbial survival rates [87]. In China, solid-state fermentation technologies have cut production costs by 40% [88]. Policy incentives, such as subsidies for biofertilizer adoption, are vital for encouraging farmer uptake in developing regions.
Figure 5: Integrative role of rhizosphere engineering in sustainable agricultural systems.
The efficacy and practical application of microbial fertilizers are receiving considerable research attention. Monitoring phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in the rhizosphere helps optimize microbial fertilizer formulations and promote crop growth by improving phosphorus availability [89]. On newly cultivated land, amendments that include microbial fertilizers significantly enhance soil physicochemical properties and reshape microbial community structure [55], leading to higher maize yield and quality, improved nutrient use efficiency, and more sustainable farming practices. These fertilizers also strengthen crop resilience against pests and salt stress, underscoring their agricultural potential.
The use of rhizosphere microorganisms represents a key advance in microbial fertilizer technology. A comprehensive strategy—encompassing careful strain selection, development of microbial consortia, and rigorous field validation—is essential to improve the consistency, effectiveness, and practical deployment of soil inoculants [90]. Combining traditional isolation with molecular and ecological techniques allows efficient screening of superior strains. Employing indigenous microbial consortia together with genetically engineered inoculants offers a promising rhizosphere-engineering strategy [91], one that boosts crop yields while fostering environmental sustainability through improved plant–microbiome interactions and long-term soil health.
Applying microbial fertilizers at optimal times, rates, and methods—tailored to crop growth stages and soil conditions—maximizes their impact. Precise dosing that matches crop nutrient demand, existing soil nutrient status, and inoculant concentration is critical for enhancing nutrient uptake, minimizing environmental leakage, and improving nitrogen-use efficiency [92]. For example, foliar application of nano-iron particles (FeNPs) increased broad-bean plant height by 35.01%, fresh weight by 47%, and pod number by 47.9% compared to untreated controls, demonstrating a sustainable solution for iron deficiency in sandy arid soils [93]. Similarly, integrating native PGPR strains (BA-3, BA-6, BA-7) with diammonium phosphate (DAP) and farmyard manure (FYM) improved wheat growth, achieving a 1000-grain weight of 55.1 g, a biological yield of 8209 kg ha−1, and an economic yield of 4572 kg ha−1, along with elevated soil total nitrogen (1.68 μg mL−1), phosphorus (0.38%), and potassium (1.33%) [94].
Microbial fertilizers—a major practical application of rhizosphere microorganisms—have been widely studied and implemented in agriculture. Organic amendments enriched with microbial inoculants not only increase soil microbial diversity and function but also drive crop yields, highlighting the central role of microbial diversity in sustainable agriculture [95]. Integrating reduced chemical fertilizers with bio-organic fertilizers improves soil health and microbial diversity while boosting crop yield and quality [96].
A key advantage of microbial fertilizers is their ability to enhance soil fertility. Beneficial microorganisms, particularly Bacillus species, can improve soil health, stimulate plant growth, and reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides [97]. Microbial biocontrol agents, especially plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and fungi, offer considerable potential for sustainable farming by raising crop yield and quality while diminishing reliance on chemical pesticides [98]. Beyond promoting plant growth, microbial fertilizers improve soil structure, increase nutrient availability, and strengthen erosion resistance [99]. Nevertheless, quality control remains a significant challenge. Optimizing cultivation and preservation techniques is essential to ensure consistent product quality, enhance microbial diversity, and increase crop productivity—all critical for sustainable agriculture [100].
7 Application of Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Agriculture
Rhizosphere microorganisms function as versatile biocontrol agents in agriculture, offering sustainable alternatives to conventional chemical inputs. One promising approach involves the use of metal-based nanoparticles, which exhibit strong antimicrobial properties and can suppress pathogens directly or indirectly by priming plant immune responses [101]. Another key mechanism is the production of antibiotics by rhizobacteria. Optimizing synergistic combinations of PGPR represents a strategic avenue for enhancing disease management, though it requires further research into strain selection, synergy quantification, and field adaptation [102] (Table 2).
Table 2: Microorganisms in the root zone and their effects on plant growth and soil quality.
| Microorganisms Type | Specific Microorganisms | Role in Plant Growth | Effect on Soil Quality | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | Rhizobium leguminosarum | Fixes atmospheric nitrogen in legume root nodules | Increases nitrogen content in soil | [73] |
| Fungi | Glomus intraradices (Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) | Enhances nutrient uptake, especially phosphorus | Improves soil structure and aggregation | [53] |
| Protozoa | Acanthamoeba spp. | Regulates bacterial populations, promotes nutrient mineralization | Enhances nutrient cycling | [103] |
| Bacteria | Pseudomonas fluorescens | Produces plant growth promoting substances | Suppresses soil-borne pathogens | [103] |
| Fungi | Trichoderma harzianum | Produces enzymes that degrade pathogenic fungi | Enhances decomposition of organic matter | [10] |
| Protozoa | Heliophrya erhardi | Stimulates microbial activity through grazing | Enhances soil nutrient availability | [104] |
| Bacteria | Azospirillum brasilense | Produces phytohormones like indole-3-acetic acid | Improves soil fertility | [76] |
| Fungi | Penicillium bilaiae | Solubilizes bound soil phosphates | Increases available phosphorus in soil | [105] |
| Bacteria | Azotobacter chroococcum | Free-living nitrogen fixation, promotes root development | Enhances soil aeration and organic matter retention | [106] |
| Fungi | Mortierella elongata | Enhances plant tolerance to heavy metal stress | Reduces soil toxicity through metal immobilization | [107] |
| Archaea | Nitrososphaera viennensis | Ammonia oxidation in nitrification process | Maintains nitrogen cycle balance in arid soils | [108] |
| Bacteria | Bacillus subtilis | Induces systemic resistance against pathogens | Improves soil enzymatic activity | [109] |
| Algae | Nostoc commune | Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in rice paddies | Secretes polysaccharides to stabilize soil aggregates | [110] |
| Fungi | Serendipita indica | Enhances drought resistance in plants | Increases soil water retention capacity | [48] |
Competitive exclusion occurs when beneficial microbes outcompete pathogens for limited resources such as nutrients and space. Manipulating the rhizosphere microbiome—through approaches such as creating biased rhizospheres—can enhance crop productivity and reduce disease incidence by favoring beneficial plant-microbe interactions [54]. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) is another important mode of action: rhizosphere microorganisms stimulate the plant’s immune system, leading to the production of defense-related compounds and broad-spectrum pathogen resistance, thereby improving plant health and yield [111]. Additionally, rhizobacteria enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stresses by modulating root architecture, hormone signaling, and nutrient uptake efficiency [112].
Beyond disease suppression, rhizosphere microorganisms play crucial roles in nutrient cycling and availability. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), which accounts for over 60% of naturally fixed nitrogen globally, is vital for sustainable agriculture [113]. Enhancing BNF efficiency can significantly reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers, support crop nitrogen demand, and mitigate environmental impacts. Certain strains also demonstrate direct biocontrol potential; for example, Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 achieves up to 71.15% control of root-knot nematodes in watermelon while increasing fungal diversity and nifH gene abundance, illustrating its utility in sustainable nematode management through rhizosphere modulation [114] (Table 3).
Table 3: Microorganisms in the rhizosphere and their roles in disease resistance and pollutant degradation.
| Microorganisms Type | Specific Microorganisms | Mechanisms of Disease Resistance | Role in Degradation of Pollutants/Heavy Metals | Quantitative Data | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | Pseudomonas fluorescens | Produces antibiotics (e.g., phenazine, pyoluteorin), competes for iron via siderophore production, induces systemic resistance in plants | - | Reduces incidence of soil-borne diseases by up to 60% | [115] |
| Bacteria | Bacillus subtilis | Produces antimicrobial lipopeptides (e.g., surfactin, iturin), competes for nutrients and space, activates plant immune responses (induced systemic resistance) | - | Increases plant disease resistance by up to 50% | [116] |
| Fungi | Trichoderma harzianum | Produces cell wall-degrading enzymes (chitinases, glucanases) against pathogenic fungi, competes for nutrients and space, induces plant defense mechanisms | - | Reduces pathogen infection rates by up to 70% | [117] |
| Bacteria | Streptomyces spp. | Produces a wide range of antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin), competes with pathogens, stimulates plant defense responses | - | Enhances plant growth and reduces disease incidence by 40% | [118] |
| Bacteria | Rhizobium leguminosarum | Induces systemic resistance, competes with soil pathogens, produces antimicrobial compounds | - | Improves legume resistance to pathogens, increasing yield by 20% | [119] |
| Bacteria | Pseudomonas putida | Produces antifungal compounds, competes for nutrients, induces systemic resistance | Degrades organic pollutants (e.g., toluene, naphthalene) | Degrades over 90% of naphthalene in contaminated soil within 10 days | [120] |
| Bacteria | Arthrobacter spp. | - | Degrades heavy metals (e.g., chromium, lead) through biosorption and biotransformation | Reduces soil lead concentration by up to 40% | [121] |
| Fungi | Aspergillus niger | - | Degrades heavy metals via biosorption (e.g., cadmium, copper) | Removes up to 80% of cadmium from contaminated soils | [122] |
| Bacteria | Sphingomonas spp. | - | Degrades recalcitrant pollutants (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, DDT) | Degrades DDT residues by up to 70% in contaminated soil | [123] |
| Fungi | White-rot fungi (Phanerochaete chrysosporium) | Produces ligninolytic enzymes that degrade pathogens, induces plant defenses | Degrades organic pollutants and some heavy metals | Degrades over 80% of pentachlorophenol in soil | [124] |
| Bacteria | Mycobacterium spp. | - | Degrades polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) | Degrades up to 60% of benzo[a]pyrene in soil over a period of weeks | [125] |
Rhizosphere microorganisms further contribute to plant growth and stress resilience by producing phytohormones and volatile organic compounds that regulate root development and systemic signaling [64]. Understanding the functional diversity of soil archaea and fungi, along with their ecological interactions, is essential for harnessing their potential in sustainable agroecosystems [126]. However, the denitrification potential of some nitrogen-fixing bacteria must be considered to fully assess their environmental net benefit [127].
These microorganisms, which include bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, coexist with plant roots in the root zone, significantly promoting plant growth and enhancing soil quality. Beneficial bacteria such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium, together with fungal communities, enhance nutrient availability, decompose organic residues, and improve soil structure, thereby supporting resilient agricultural systems [128]. Root exudates mediate these interactions and can be strategically managed to suppress soil-borne pathogens and enhance plant immunity under changing climatic conditions [129]. Amendments such as biochar can further strengthen soil disease suppression by fostering beneficial microbes that produce antibiotics and induce plant defense responses [130].
Integrated management practices—including microbial fertilizers and crop diversification—improve soil health, increase crop yield and quality, and reduce negative impacts from excessive chemical inputs [131]. For instance, applying microbial fertilizer (0.24 kg m−2) in saline-alkali soil raised organic carbon, available phosphorus, and potassium by 21.50%, 26.14%, and 36.30%, respectively, while reducing pH and electrical conductivity, ultimately increasing sweet sorghum yield by 24.19% [132]. Similarly, amending ginger field soil with tomato compost and Bacillus subtilis increased soil organic matter by 17.34% and boosted activities of key enzymes (urease, phosphatase, sucrase) by 55.89%, 35.59%, and 57.21% [133].
Microbial inoculants and tailored fertilization further enhance agricultural sustainability. Optimized NPK fertilization (600, 120, and 80 mg plant−1, respectively) in chrysanthemum cultivation improved plant growth metrics by 10.6–40.4% and enriched beneficial bacteria such as Proteobacteria, thereby enhancing nutrient cycling and use efficiency [134]. Conversely, soil acidification (pH decline from 7.6 to 5.1) can shift nitrogen competition from microbes to plants, though the overall nitrogen acquired may remain nutritionally insufficient [135]. Prebiotic metabolites offer another avenue by selectively stimulating beneficial rhizosphere colonizers, which in turn suppress pathogens and improve plant health [136]. Strains such as Serratia surfactantfaciens and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens have demonstrated effective biocontrol via hydrolytic enzyme and antibiotic production [137]. Additionally, cyanobacteria provide sustainable alternatives by improving nutrient use, alleviating abiotic stress, and supporting phytoremediation [138].
Collectively, rhizosphere microorganisms—through nitrogen fixation (Fig. 6), phosphate solubilization, hormone production, and pathogen suppression—enhance nutrient-use efficiency by 20–30%, reduce reliance on chemical fertilizers, and contribute to the development of productive and sustainable agricultural systems [139].
Figure 6: Translational barriers and technological innovations for microbial inoculants.
8 Effects of Soil Environment on Rhizosphere Microorganisms
Soil type—categorized primarily into sandy, loamy, and clayey textures—fundamentally shapes the physicochemical habitat of rhizosphere microorganisms. Sandy soils, with large particle size and high porosity, provide favorable aeration but exhibit poor water and nutrient retention. In contrast, loamy soils offer a balanced structure with medium-sized particles, rich organic matter content, and optimal water-holding capacity, supporting diverse microbial life. Clayey soils are characterized by fine, cohesive particles that retain moisture effectively but limit gas exchange, influencing microbial activity accordingly.
Soil texture directly modulates microbial diversity and community assembly. For instance, a loam content of 20% was associated with a 10% reduction in prokaryotic operational taxonomic unit richness and a 15% decrease in protist Shannon diversity [140]. Increasing loam proportion to 60% enhanced rhizosphere selectivity, raising the abundance of specific prokaryotic taxa by 0.45%. Sandy soils, under aerated drip irrigation (ADI), showed increased relative abundance of Firmicutes and Gemmatimonadetes (up to 3%) but reduced Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, while fungal phylum Mortierellomycota increased by up to 25% [141]. These shifts illustrate how irrigation management can optimize microbial communities for improved nutrient cycling in carbon- and phosphorus-enriched soils.
Prolonged drought strongly inhibits enzyme activities and reduces bacterial diversity in sandy soils, whereas loamy soils demonstrate greater resilience, enabling rapid recovery of nitrification and microbial function after rewetting [142]. Soil organic management further enhances microbial biomass [68]; in organic cropping systems, total phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) reached 43.9 nmol g−1, exceeding levels in conventional (32.8 nmol g−1) and low-input (31.4 nmol g−1) systems [143]. Fungal activity is particularly promoted in microaggregates, where PLFA-C concentration (9.2%) exceeds that in silt-and-clay fractions (6.5%), highlighting microhabitat effects on microbial carbon processing.
Soil texture also governs the distribution of functional microbial groups. In maize rhizospheres, acdS-carrying Actinobacteria were more abundant in sandy soils (46–92%) compared to loam (28–65%), whereas acdS-carrying Proteobacteria dominated in loam (34–72%) over sand (8.6–53.9%) [144]. Such taxon-specific responses underscore the need to consider soil physical properties when designing rhizosphere engineering strategies aimed at enhancing plant stress resilience and nutrient acquisition.
Salinity represents another critical environmental filter. Variations in soil salinity (0.36–6.72 dS m−1) correlate with declines in key soil nutrients and enzymatic activities, including organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and hydrolase functions [145]. Saline-alkaline conditions favor halotolerant taxa such as Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, while increasing cadmium availability by 34.1–49.7% [146]. Keystone genera like Blastococcus and Gemmatimonas—though comprising <1% of total communities—play vital roles in community adaptation and heavy metal mitigation.
Soil pH further influences microbial dynamics by altering nutrient solubility and ion toxicity. Acidic conditions increase aluminum and manganese availability, inhibiting microbial growth [147]. Nitrogen-induced acidification reduces topsoil fungal diversity by up to 14.7% [148], whereas amendments like acidified biochar can enhance crop growth and promote beneficial bacteria (e.g., Streptococcus, Mycothermus) in saline-alkaline soils. Moderate salinity (~1.5%) may stimulate nitrogen removal by enriching taxa such as Flavobacterium and Paracoccus, but higher salinity disrupts microbial synergy and metabolic function.
Microorganisms actively modify their soil environment through biochemical processes and feedback mechanisms, influencing structure, hydrology, and nutrient availability [149]. Amendments like magnesium-montmorillonite and metal oxide-modified biochars can immobilize heavy metals and reduce phosphorus leaching, with efficacy depending on local soil and microbial community characteristics [150].
In summary, soil texture, salinity, pH, and organic matter interact to shape rhizosphere microbial composition and function. Understanding these relationships is essential for developing tailored management practices that enhance microbial-mediated nutrient cycling, stress tolerance, and overall agroecosystem sustainability.
9 Effects of Agricultural Management Practices on Rhizosphere Microorganisms
Different farming practices can significantly alter soil structure and properties, thereby directly or indirectly affecting the quantity and activity of rhizosphere microorganisms (Fig. 7). Modified tillage techniques that incorporate straw at different depths improve soil structure, increase soil organic carbon by up to 11.4%, and enhance subsoil porosity and aggregate stability [151]. Organic amendments not only ameliorate soil structure and carbon dynamics in saline soils but also selectively promote halotolerant microbial species, resulting in a more oxygenated rhizosphere that supports microbial adaptation, nutrient cycling, and potentially higher crop productivity [152]. In contrast, no-tillage (NT) practices preserve soil aggregate integrity, leading to a significant increase in aggregates larger than 1 mm (P < 0.001) and greater bacterial alpha diversity—measured by Shannon and ACE indices—compared to conventional tillage [153]. These findings highlight the capacity of NT to foster beneficial soil microbial communities and enhance soil productivity.
Figure 7: Impact of agricultural management on rhizosphere microbiome dynamics.
Organic and conventional farming systems differ substantially in their impact on soil ecosystems. Organic farming reduces reliance on chemical pesticides while promoting soil biodiversity and microbial activity. This approach can increase soil organic matter by up to 28% and reduce nitrogen leaching by as much as 50% [154]. The application of organic manure enriches bacterial and fungal communities, particularly Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, while decreasing actinomycetes in alluvial paddy soils, reflecting a shift in indigenous microbial structure [155]. Additionally, manufactured nano-objects (MNOs) present a promising strategy to enhance agricultural sustainability by precisely manipulating the soil microbiome through controlled delivery of active ingredients and regulation of microbial interactions [156].
Intercropping significantly improves soil macro-aggregates (>2 mm) by 15.5–58.6% across various sites and years [157]. This improvement is linked to shifts in microbial communities, including increases in Sordariales and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alongside a reduction in Nitrospirae. Long-term crop rotation (LTCR, 30 years) enhances soil quality, as indicated by increased water-stable aggregates (>2 mm), elevated soil organic matter, and microbial biomass carbon reaching 2493 μg g−1. Compared to short-term rotation (STCR, 4 years), LTCR boosts microbial biomass by 58% and alters community composition, with increased abundances of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria [158]. Enhanced plant holobiomes (EPHs)—formed through symbioses with Rhizobiaceae, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma, and Piriformospora indica—can raise crop yields by up to 50% by improving plant growth, nutrient uptake, and stress tolerance. EPHs also contribute to soil organic matter accumulation (up to 15%) and atmospheric CO2 sequestration [159]. Moreover, intercropping enriches soil biodiversity by enhancing microbial network modularity and functional diversity, enriching nitrogen-cycling genes and microbial taxa, which in turn improves nutrient availability and sustains crop yields 17% higher than in monoculture systems [160].
The climate-water-energy-food (CWEF) nexus offers a holistic framework for evaluating the sustainability of irrigation with desalinated seawater, considering interconnected social, economic, and environmental factors [161]. Optimizing nitrogen application at 160 kg N ha−1 maximizes maize yield (10.6 Mg ha−1) and grain protein while reducing risks of acidification, eutrophication, global warming, and health impacts by 29%, 42%, 35%, and 32%, respectively [162]. Coordinated irrigation (337.3–354.9 mm) combined with nitrogen fertilization (181.2–198.6 kg ha−1) optimizes spring wheat yield, economic returns, and resource efficiency while minimizing soil nitrogen residue [163]. Integrated rhizosphere management strategies, including rhizosphere engineering and plant modification, can mitigate drought stress by improving root architecture, nutrient uptake, and stress tolerance [164]. Precision fertigation reduces nitrogen and phosphorus inputs by 8–25% and potassium by up to 17% without significantly affecting maize growth or yield, thereby increasing nutrient use efficiency by up to 25% and raising net profits [165].
Wheat straw biochar application increases water-holding capacity by 12%, enhances leaf gas exchange by 15%, and improves biomass and potassium content by 18% and 25%, respectively [166]. Sandy soils in young oasis fields show 6.2 times greater deep drainage and 1.65 times higher nitrogen leaching compared to loamy soils in older fields, leading to a 23.9% reduction in crop yield and a 27.2% decrease in nitrogen use efficiency [167]. These results underscore the importance of soil structure management for improving water and nutrient retention. Additionally, waterlogging stress impairs cotton growth by reducing soil oxygen, thereby limiting biomass accumulation and triggering physiological, biochemical, and molecular stress responses [168]. Optimal nutrient management—applying 225 kg N ha−1, 67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1, and 225 kg K2O ha−1 at flowering—maximizes nutrient accumulation rates (up to 6.31, 1.44, and 6.24 kg ha−1 d−1 for N, P, and K, respectively) and recovery efficiency [169].
Introducing chickpeas, lentils, and safflower into rice-fallow systems, together with conservation tillage such as Zero Tillage Direct Seeded Rice with Residue Retention, increases winter crop yields by up to 190%, improves energy use efficiency by 11–20%, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 30% compared to conventional puddled transplanting [170]. Incorporating oilseed rape into rice rotations enhances soil microbial diversity by up to 49.7%, enriching key bacterial (e.g., Clostridium, Pedobacter) and fungal (e.g., Mortierella, Ascomycota) groups, while also improving soil fertility through increased total nitrogen (up to 49.7%), available phosphorus, and aggregate stability [171,172].
Rhizosphere microorganisms occupy specific metabolic niches, facilitated by biochemical pathways that support root colonization and pathogen suppression [173]. Intercropping peanut with maize and oilseed rape modifies rhizosphere metabolite profiles and stimulates the growth and nitrogen-fixing activity of free-living and symbiotic bacteria, thereby improving soil nitrogen availability [174]. Nitrogen fertilization markedly alters soil microbial dynamics, reducing bacterial diversity while increasing fungal diversity at a rate of 50 kg N ha−1 year−1, illustrating the intricate relationship among nutrient levels, plant diversity, and microbial functions in nutrient cycling and pathogen suppression [175]. Diversified crop rotations—including cereals, oilseeds, and legumes—reduce the severity of wheat leaf blotch by 20% and lower disease indices compared to monocultures, with particular benefits under no-tillage conditions [176]. Furthermore, maize–soybean intercropping enhances root exudation, increasing amino acid levels by 3.61-fold and boosting arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization by 105.99–111.18%, alongside improvements in soil available nitrogen and phosphorus [177]. These results emphasize the pivotal role of root exudates in mediating plant–microbe interactions and sustaining the advantages of intercropping systems.
10 Biotic Interactions in the Rhizosphere
The rhizosphere is a hotspot of biological activity where intricate interactions between plants and their associated microbiota critically influence plant growth, health, and ecosystem functioning. These biotic interactions encompass a spectrum of relationships—from mutualistic to competitive—that govern nutrient acquisition, stress resilience, and pathogen dynamics.
Chemical dialogue forms the basis of plant-microbe interactions. Root exudates, comprising sugars, amino acids, organic acids, and secondary metabolites, serve as signaling molecules and nutritional substrates that selectively attract beneficial microbial consortia. Conversely, plants under pathogen attack can recruit biocontrol microbes through altered exudate profiles, demonstrating active rhizosphere management by the host.
Within the rhizosphere, microbial communities engage in complex networks of competition and cooperation that shape community structure and function. Competitive exclusion for resources (e.g., carbon, iron, space) can suppress pathogenic populations; for example, siderophore-producing Pseudomonas outcompetes fungi for iron, reducing disease incidence by 60–80% [178]. Conversely, synergistic interactions enhance community resilience and functionality. Cross-feeding and metabolic cooperation among nitrogen fixers, phosphate solubilizers, and biocontrol agents can increase nutrient use efficiency and plant growth promotion by 20–40% [179]. Biofilm formation further exemplifies cooperation, where polymicrobial aggregates improve stress survival and root colonization through shared extracellular polymeric substances.
The rhizosphere extends beyond bacteria and fungi to include protozoa, nematodes, and microarthropods, forming a multi-trophic food web that regulates microbial turnover and nutrient cycling. Bacterivorous protozoa and nematodes graze on microbial biomass, releasing immobilized nutrients in plant-available forms—a process termed the “microbial loop.” Mycorrhizal fungi also interact with helper bacteria, facilitating hyphal growth and nutrient exchange, thereby creating a tightly linked microbial network that supports plant health.
A major ecological constraint on inoculant success is colonization resistance. Recent work demonstrates that the molecular composition of soil organic carbon modulates plant immune status and the resident microbial community, creating a biochemical barrier that limits establishment of introduced strains [68]. These interconnected biotic relationships translate into measurable agroecological outcomes. Diverse microbial networks enhance soil suppressiveness against pathogens, improve aggregate stability via fungal hyphae and bacterial polysaccharides, and buffer plants against abiotic stress through induced systemic resistance. Understanding and harnessing these interactions—through tailored inoculants, diversified cropping, or microbiome engineering—offers a pathway to more robust and sustainable agricultural systems.
This review synthesizes three decades of research to elucidate how rhizosphere microorganisms enhance sustainable agriculture through nutrient cycling, disease suppression, and stress tolerance. Key advancements include CRISPR-engineered nitrogen fixers, nano-encapsulated inoculants, and synthetic microbial consortia that boost yields by 12–40% while reducing chemical inputs by 30–50%. However, field efficacy remains limited by soil heterogeneity, inoculant survival, and regulatory gaps. Future research must prioritize (1) scalable microbial formulations tailored to soil types, (2) integrated omics and field validation, and (3) policy frameworks incentivizing biofertilizer adoption. By bridging lab-to-field gaps, rhizosphere engineering can align with UN Sustainable Development Goals, ensuring food security while restoring soil health.
Acknowledgement:
Funding Statement: This research was funded by the Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education Youth innovation team construction research project, Grant No. 25JP205, 24JP208, 22JP101, 21JP141, 23JP189; Yan’an Key Industrial Chain Project (2025SLZDCY-050).
Author Contributions: Yingying Xing: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft. Rong Wei: Formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft. Xiukang Wang: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, writing—review & editing. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Availability of Data and Materials: Not applicable.
Ethics Approval: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Shahzad A , Ullah S , Dar AA , Sardar MF , Mehmood T , Tufail MA , et al. Nexus on climate change: agriculture and possible solution to cope future climate change stresses. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021; 28( 12): 14211– 32. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12649-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Mulugeta M , Gelaw TA , Rabuma T . The dynamic interplay between rhizospheric microorganisms and plant health: implications for enhancing growth and stress resilience in sustainable agriculture. J Plant Nutr. 2025; 48( 18): 3134– 64. doi:10.1080/01904167.2025.2509131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Mulugeta M , Yimer D , Rabuma T . Evaluating the potential of rhizobacterial isolates enhancing sorghum’s abiotic stress tolerance: a focus on Ethiopian soil isolates from sorghum root. J Agron Crop Sci. 2025; 211( 3): e70062. doi:10.1111/jac.70062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Barra Caracciolo A , Terenzi V . Rhizosphere microbial communities and heavy metals. Microorganisms. 2021; 9( 7): 1462. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9071462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Ujvári G , Turrini A , Avio L , Agnolucci M . Possible role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated bacteria in the recruitment of endophytic bacterial communities by plant roots. Mycorrhiza. 2021; 31( 5): 527– 44. doi:10.1007/s00572-021-01040-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Zehra A , Raytekar NA , Meena M , Swapnil P . Efficiency of microbial bio-agents as elicitors in plant defense mechanism under biotic stress: a review. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2021; 2: 100054. doi:10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Li JY , Chen P , Li ZG , Li LY , Zhang RQ , Hu W , et al. Soil aggregate-associated organic carbon mineralization and its driving factors in rhizosphere soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023; 186: 109182. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Yang Y , Zhang Y , Yu X , Jia G . Soil microorganism regulated aggregate stability and rill erosion resistance under different land uses. Catena. 2023; 228: 107176. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2023.107176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Wang M , Feng X , Zhou Z , Ma H , Ge T , Tang C , et al. Labile organic carbon fractions in the rhizosphere contribute to nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in rice under long-term crop rotations and nitrogen application. Appl Soil Ecol. 2024; 200: 105459. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Rozmoš M , Bukovská P , Hršelová H , Kotianová M , Dudáš M , Gančarčíková K , et al. Organic nitrogen utilisation by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus is mediated by specific soil bacteria and a protist. ISME J. 2022; 16( 3): 676– 85. doi:10.1038/s41396-021-01112-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Thepbandit W , Athinuwat D . Rhizosphere microorganisms supply availability of soil nutrients and induce plant defense. Microorganisms. 2024; 12( 3): 558. doi:10.3390/microorganisms12030558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Saeed Q , Wang X , Haider FU , Kučerik J , Mumtaz MZ , Holatko J , et al. Rhizosphere bacteria in plant growth promotion, biocontrol, and bioremediation of contaminated sites: a comprehensive review of effects and mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22( 19): 10529. doi:10.3390/ijms221910529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Verma KK , Song XP , Li DM , Singh M , Wu JM , Singh RK , et al. Silicon and soil microorganisms improve rhizospheric soil health with bacterial community, plant growth, performance and yield. Plant Signal Behav. 2022; 17( 1): 2104004. doi:10.1080/15592324.2022.2104004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. de Andrade LA , Santos CHB , Frezarin ET , Sales LR , Rigobelo EC . Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agricultural production. Microorganisms. 2023; 11( 4): 1088. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11041088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Jain A , Sarsaiya S , Singh R , Gong Q , Wu Q , Shi J . Omics approaches in understanding the benefits of plant-microbe interactions. Front Microbiol. 2024; 15: 1391059. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1391059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Diwan D , Rashid MM , Vaishnav A . Current understanding of plant-microbe interaction through the lenses of multi-omics approaches and their benefits in sustainable agriculture. Microbiol Res. 2022; 265: 127180. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. González JE , Marketon MM . Quorum sensing in nitrogen-fixing rhizobia. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003; 67( 4): 574– 92. doi:10.1128/MMBR.67.4.574-592.2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Rodríguez H , Fraga R . Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv. 1999; 17( 4–5): 319– 39. doi:10.1016/s0734-9750(99)00014-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Vicente-Santos A , Willink B , Nowak K , Civitello DJ , Gillespie TR . Host-pathogen interactions under pressure: a review and meta-analysis of stress-mediated effects on disease dynamics. Ecol Lett. 2023; 26( 11): 2003– 20. doi:10.1111/ele.14319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Xing Y , Chen M , Wang X . Enhancing water use efficiency and fruit quality in jujube cultivation: a review of advanced irrigation techniques and precision management strategies. Agric Water Manag. 2025; 307: 109243. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Manriquez B , Muller D , Prigent-Combaret C . Experimental evolution in plant-microbe systems: a tool for deciphering the functioning and evolution of plant-associated microbial communities. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 619122. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.619122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Kaur J , Sharma J . Orchid root associated bacteria: linchpins or accessories? Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 661966. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.661966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Ahmad HM , Fiaz S , Hafeez S , Zahra S , Shah AN , Gul B , et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria eliminate the effect of drought stress in plants: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 875774. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.875774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Pattnaik S , Mohapatra B , Gupta A . Plant growth-promoting microbe mediated uptake of essential nutrients (Fe, P, K) for crop stress management: microbe–soil–plant continuum. Front Agron. 2021; 3: 689972. doi:10.3389/fagro.2021.689972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
25. Xing Y , Wang X . Precision agriculture and water conservation strategies for sustainable crop production in arid regions. Plants. 2024; 13( 22): 3184. doi:10.3390/plants13223184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
26. Wang X . Integrative strategies for sustainable agriculture in the face of climate change. npj Sustain Agric. 2025; 3: 66. doi:10.1038/s44264-025-00108-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
27. Xing Y , Wang X . Impact of agricultural activities on climate change: a review of greenhouse gas emission patterns in field crop systems. Plants. 2024; 13( 16): 2285. doi:10.3390/plants13162285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Mo F , Yang D , Wang X , Crowther TW , Vinay N , Luo Z , et al. Nutrient limitation of soil organic carbon stocks under straw return. Soil Biol Biochem. 2024; 192: 109360. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Xing Y , Wang X , Mustafa A . Exploring the link between soil health and crop productivity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025; 289: 117703. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Ali M , Cybulska J , Frąc M , Zdunek A . Application of polysaccharides for the encapsulation of beneficial microorganisms for agricultural purposes: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023; 244: 125366. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
31. Yuan A , Kumar SD , Wang H , Wang S , Impa S , Wang H , et al. Dynamic interplay among soil nutrients, rhizosphere metabolites, and microbes shape drought and heat stress responses in summer maize. Soil Biol Biochem. 2024; 191: 109357. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Ge J , Li D , Ding J , Xiao X , Liang Y . Microbial coexistence in the rhizosphere and the promotion of plant stress resistance: a review. Environ Res. 2023; 222: 115298. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.115298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Kumaishi K , Usui E , Suzuki K , Kobori S , Sato T , Toda Y , et al. High throughput method of 16S rRNA gene sequencing library preparation for plant root microbial community profiling. Sci Rep. 2022; 12( 1): 19289. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23943-x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Huang Y , Wu Q , Liu C , Yu P , Li H , Tang S , et al. Ribosomal RNA operon copy number: a trait-informed framework to close the microbial cultivation gap. iMetaOmics. 2025: e70071. doi:10.1002/imo2.70071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
35. Tang Z , Zhang L , He N , Liu Z , Ma Z , Fu L , et al. Influence of planting methods and organic amendments on rice yield and bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 918986. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.918986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Zhou X , Gao D , Liu J , Qiao P , Zhou X , Lu H , et al. Changes in rhizosphere soil microbial communities in a continuously monocropped cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) system. Eur J Soil Biol. 2014; 60: 1– 8. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.10.005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Pan P , Gu Y , Sun DL , Wu QL , Zhou NY . Microbial diversity biased estimation caused by intragenomic heterogeneity and interspecific conservation of 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023; 89( 5): e02108– 22. doi:10.1128/aem.02108-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
38. Jiao P , Yang L , Li Z , Liu C , Zheng P , Tong D , et al. Responses of microbial community composition and respiration to soil moisture in eroded soil. Appl Soil Ecol. 2023; 181: 104662. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Kleber M , Bourg IC , Coward EK , Hansel CM , Myneni SCB , Nunan N . Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter interface. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2021; 2( 6): 402– 21. doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Kang E , Li Y , Zhang X , Yan Z , Wu H , Li M , et al. Soil pH and nutrients shape the vertical distribution of microbial communities in an Alpine wetland. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 774: 145780. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
41. Santoyo G , Urtis-Flores CA , Loeza-Lara PD , Orozco-Mosqueda MDC , Glick BR . Rhizosphere colonization determinants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Biology. 2021; 10( 6): 475. doi:10.3390/biology10060475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
42. Sharma I , Kashyap S , Agarwala N . Biotic stress-induced changes in root exudation confer plant stress tolerance by altering rhizospheric microbial community. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14: 1132824. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1132824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
43. Das PP , Singh KR , Nagpure G , Mansoori A , Singh RP , Ahmad Ghazi I , et al. Plant-soil-microbes: a tripartite interaction for nutrient acquisition and better plant growth for sustainable agricultural practices. Environ Res. 2022; 214: 113821. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
44. Chai YN , Schachtman DP . Root exudates impact plant performance under abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2022; 27( 1): 80– 91. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.08.003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Wang H , Chen H , Chen Y , Yang E , Chen L , Chen Q , et al. Revealing the response of community structure and metabolic pathway to varying organic matter stress in a dissolved oxygen-differentiated airlift internal circulation partial nitritation-anammox system. Sci Total Environ. 2023; 886: 164002. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
46. Bao X , Zou J , Zhang B , Wu L , Yang T , Huang Q . Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and microbes interaction in rice mycorrhizosphere. Agronomy. 2022; 12( 6): 1277. doi:10.3390/agronomy12061277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Kong Z , Liu H . Modification of rhizosphere microbial communities: a possible mechanism of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhancing plant growth and fitness. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 920813. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.920813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
48. Zhang F , Chen M , Xing Y , Wang X . Appropriate nitrogen application under ridge-furrow plastic film mulching planting optimizes spring maize growth characteristics by improving soil quality in the Loess Plateau of China. Agric Water Manag. 2025; 307( C): 109259. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109259 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
49. Fang J , Wei S , Gao Y , Zhang X , Cheng Y , Wang J , et al. Character variation of root space microbial community composition in the response of drought-tolerant spring wheat to drought stress. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1235708. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1235708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
50. Kang BG , Kim WT , Yun HS , Chang SC . Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to control stress responses of plant roots. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2010; 4( 3): 179– 83. doi:10.1007/s11816-010-0136-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
51. Garcia J , Kao-Kniffin J . Microbial group dynamics in plant rhizospheres and their implications on nutrient cycling. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9: 1516. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
52. Grzyb A , Wolna-Maruwka A , Niewiadomska A . The significance of microbial transformation of nitrogen compounds in the light of integrated crop management. Agronomy. 2021; 11( 7): 1415. doi:10.3390/agronomy11071415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
53. Kong WL , Li PS , Wu XQ , Wu TY , Sun XR . Forest tree associated bacterial diffusible and volatile organic compounds against various phytopathogenic fungi. Microorganisms. 2020; 8( 4): 590. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8040590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
54. Mohanram S , Kumar P . Rhizosphere microbiome: revisiting the synergy of plant-microbe interactions. Ann Microbiol. 2019; 69( 4): 307– 20. doi:10.1007/s13213-019-01448-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
55. Han J , Dong Y , Zhang M . Chemical fertilizer reduction with organic fertilizer effectively improve soil fertility and microbial community from newly cultivated land in the Loess Plateau of China. Appl Soil Ecol. 2021; 165: 103966. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
56. Li G , Liu T , Whalen JK , Wei Z . Nematodes: an overlooked tiny engineer of plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2024; 29( 1): 52– 63. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2023.06.022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
57. Majeed A , Muhammad Z , Ahmad H . Plant growth promoting bacteria: role in soil improvement, abiotic and biotic stress management of crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2018; 37( 12): 1599– 609. doi:10.1007/s00299-018-2341-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
58. Angulo V , Beriot N , Garcia-Hernandez E , Li E , Masteling R , Lau JA . Plant–microbe eco-evolutionary dynamics in a changing world. New Phytol. 2022; 234( 6): 1919– 28. doi:10.1111/nph.18015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
59. Kurepin LV , Zaman M , Pharis RP . Phytohormonal basis for the plant growth promoting action of naturally occurring biostimulators. J Sci Food Agric. 2014; 94( 9): 1715– 22. doi:10.1002/jsfa.6545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
60. Yu S , Bekkering CS , Tian L . Metabolic engineering in woody plants: challenges, advances, and opportunities. aBIOTECH. 2021; 2( 3): 299– 313. doi:10.1007/s42994-021-00054-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
61. Li Z , Duan S , Ouyang X , Song S , Chen D , Fan X , et al. Coupled soil moisture management and alginate oligosaccharide strategies enhance Citrus orchard production, water and potassium use efficiency by improving the rhizosphere soil environment. Agric Water Manag. 2024; 297: 108828. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
62. Ramakrishna W , Yadav R , Li K . Plant growth promoting bacteria in agriculture: two sides of a coin. Appl Soil Ecol. 2019; 138: 10– 8. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
63. Lee JH , Anderson AJ , Kim YC . Root-associated bacteria are biocontrol agents for multiple plant pests. Microorganisms. 2022; 10( 5): 1053. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10051053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
64. Ravelo-Ortega G , Raya-González J , López-Bucio J . Compounds from rhizosphere microbes that promote plant growth. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2023; 73: 102336. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2023.102336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
65. Afridi MS , Fakhar A , Kumar A , Ali S , Medeiros FHV , Muneer MA , et al. Harnessing microbial multitrophic interactions for rhizosphere microbiome engineering. Microbiol Res. 2022; 265: 127199. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
66. Bhat AA , Shakeel A , Waqar S , Ahmad Handoo Z , Khan AA . Microbes vs. nematodes: insights into biocontrol through antagonistic organisms to control root-knot nematodes. Plants. 2023; 12( 3): 451. doi:10.3390/plants12030451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
67. Lahlali R , Ezrari S , Radouane N , Kenfaoui J , Esmaeel Q , El Hamss H , et al. Biological control of plant pathogens: a global perspective. Microorganisms. 2022; 10( 3): 596. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10030596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
68. Huang Y , Tang S , Liu R , Yu P , Liu J , Xiao T , et al. Soil organic carbon mediates plant immunity-rhizosphere microbiome interactions and controls colonization resistance to microbial inoculants. Cell Host Microbe. 2025; 33( 11): 1929– 44.e7. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2025.10.002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
69. Mahmud K , Makaju S , Ibrahim R , Missaoui A . Current progress in nitrogen fixing plants and microbiome research. Plants. 2020; 9( 1): 97. doi:10.3390/plants9010097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
70. Imran . Integration of organic, inorganic and bio fertilizer, improve maize-wheat system productivity and soil nutrients. J Plant Nutr. 2024; 47( 15): 2494– 510. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2354190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
71. Momin SC , Pradhan RB , Nath J , Lalmuanzeli R , Kar A , Mehta SK . Metal sequestration by Microcystis extracellular polymers: a promising path to greener water treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2024; 31( 7): 11192– 213. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-31755-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
72. Abbas HS , Abou Baker DH , Elshimy R , Abou Elazm FI , Khan J . Bacterial secondary metabolites: recent advances and agricultural applications. In: Bacterial secondary metabolites. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2024. p. 399– 414. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95251-4.00022-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
73. Singh RK , Singh P , Li HB , Song QQ , Guo DJ , Solanki MK , et al. Diversity of nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria associated with sugarcane: a comprehensive study of plant-microbe interactions for growth enhancement in Saccharum spp. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20( 1): 220. doi:10.1186/s12870-020-02400-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
74. Pan L , Cai B . Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria: advances in their physiology, molecular mechanisms and microbial community effects. Microorganisms. 2023; 11( 12): 2904. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11122904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
75. Sarr PS , Tibiri EB , Fukuda M , Zongo AN , Compaore E , Nakamura S . Phosphate-solubilizing fungi and alkaline phosphatase trigger the P solubilization during the co-composting of sorghum straw residues with Burkina Faso phosphate rock. Front Environ Sci. 2020; 8: 559195. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2020.559195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
76. Wang Z , Zhang H , Liu L , Li S , Xie J , Xue X , et al. Screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and their abilities of phosphorus solubilization and wheat growth promotion. BMC Microbiol. 2022; 22( 1): 296. doi:10.1186/s12866-022-02715-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
77. da Silva LI , Pereira MC , de Carvalho AMX , Buttrós VH , Pasqual M , Dória J . Phosphorus-solubilizing microorganisms: a key to sustainable agriculture. Agriculture. 2023; 13( 2): 462. doi:10.3390/agriculture13020462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
78. Lurthy T , Pivato B , Lemanceau P , Mazurier S . Importance of the rhizosphere microbiota in iron biofortification of plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 744445. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.744445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
79. Younas N , Fatima I , Ali Ahmad I , Ayyaz MK . Alleviation of zinc deficiency in plants and humans through an effective technique; biofortification: a detailed review. Acta Ecol Sin. 2023; 43( 3): 419– 25. doi:10.1016/j.chnaes.2022.07.008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
80. Vega A , Delgado N , Handford M . Increasing heavy metal tolerance by the exogenous application of organic acids. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23( 10): 5438. doi:10.3390/ijms23105438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
81. Zhang F , Wang X , Liu S , Ren H , Wang Y , Han J . Effects of different pipe burial depths on crop yield, water productivity, and irrigation water productivity: a global meta–analysis. Eur J Agron. 2025; 166: 127562. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2025.127562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
82. Bomle DV , Kiran A , Kumar JK , Nagaraj LS , Pradeep CK , Ansari MA , et al. Plants saline environment in perception with rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22( 21): 11461. doi:10.3390/ijms222111461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
83. Hönig M , Roeber VM , Schmülling T , Cortleven A . Chemical priming of plant defense responses to pathogen attacks. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14: 1146577. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1146577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
84. Zhang F , Chen M , Xing Y , Wang X . Blended urea application improves spring maize productivity and soil quality, especially under ridge-furrow plastic film mulching planting. Eur J Agron. 2026; 172: 127877. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2025.127877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
85. Xing Y , Zheng Y , Wang X . Integrated strategies for effective remediation of chromium-contaminated soils: advancements, challenges, and sustainability implications. Environ Adv. 2025; 19: 100614. doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2025.100614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
86. Jimoh AA , Senbadejo TY , Adeleke R , Lin J . Development and genetic engineering of hyper-producing microbial strains for improved synthesis of biosurfactants. Mol Biotechnol. 2021; 63( 4): 267– 88. doi:10.1007/s12033-021-00302-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
87. Vassileva M , Malusà E , Sas-Paszt L , Trzcinski P , Galvez A , Flor-Peregrin E , et al. Fermentation strategies to improve soil bio-inoculant production and quality. Microorganisms. 2021; 9( 6): 1254. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9061254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
88. Wang J , Huang Z , Jiang Q , Roubík H , Xu Q , Gharsallaoui A , et al. Fungal solid-state fermentation of crops and their by-products to obtain protein resources: the next frontier of food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023; 138: 628– 44. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.06.020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
89. Elhaissoufi W , Ghoulam C , Barakat A , Zeroual Y , Bargaz A . Phosphate bacterial solubilization: a key rhizosphere driving force enabling higher P use efficiency and crop productivity. J Adv Res. 2022; 38: 13– 28. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.08.014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
90. O’Callaghan M , Ballard RA , Wright D . Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: limitations and opportunities. Soil Use Manag. 2022; 38( 3): 1340– 69. doi:10.1111/sum.12811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
91. Mahmud K , Missaoui A , Lee K , Ghimire B , Presley HW , Makaju S . Rhizosphere microbiome manipulation for sustainable crop production. Curr Plant Biol. 2021; 27: 100210. doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
92. Barłóg P , Grzebisz W , Łukowiak R . Fertilizers and fertilization strategies mitigating soil factors constraining efficiency of nitrogen in plant production. Plants. 2022; 11( 14): 1855. doi:10.3390/plants11141855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
93. Mahmoud AWM , Ayad AA , Abdel-Aziz HSM , Williams LL , El-Shazoly RM , Abdel-Wahab A , et al. Foliar application of different iron sources improves morpho-physiological traits and nutritional quality of broad bean grown in sandy soil. Plants. 2022; 11( 19): 2599. doi:10.3390/plants11192599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
94. Asghar I , Ahmed M , Farooq MA , Ishtiaq M , Arshad M , Akram M , et al. Characterizing indigenous plant growth promoting bacteria and their synergistic effects with organic and chemical fertilizers on wheat (Triticum aestivum). Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14: 1232271. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1232271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
95. Shu X , He J , Zhou Z , Xia L , Hu Y , Zhang Y , et al. Organic amendments enhance soil microbial diversity, microbial functionality and crop yields: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 829: 154627. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
96. Jin N , Jin L , Wang S , Li J , Liu F , Liu Z , et al. Reduced chemical fertilizer combined with bio-organic fertilizer affects the soil microbial community and yield and quality of lettuce. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 863325. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.863325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
97. Ortiz A , Sansinenea E . The role of beneficial microorganisms in soil quality and plant health. Sustainability. 2022; 14( 9): 5358. doi:10.3390/su14095358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
98. El-Saadony MT , Saad AM , Soliman SM , Salem HM , Ahmed AI , Mahmood M , et al. Plant growth-promoting microorganisms as biocontrol agents of plant diseases: mechanisms, challenges and future perspectives. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 923880. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.923880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
99. Wei X , Xie B , Wan C , Song R , Zhong W , Xin S , et al. Enhancing soil health and plant growth through microbial fertilizers: mechanisms, benefits, and sustainable agricultural practices. Agronomy. 2024; 14( 3): 609. doi:10.3390/agronomy14030609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
100. Sabir MS , Shahzadi F , Ali F , Shakeela Q , Niaz Z , Ahmed S . Comparative effect of fertilization practices on soil microbial diversity and activity: an overview. Curr Microbiol. 2021; 78( 10): 3644– 55. doi:10.1007/s00284-021-02634-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
101. Li Y , Zhang P , Li M , Shakoor N , Adeel M , Zhou P , et al. Application and mechanisms of metal-based nanoparticles in the control of bacterial and fungal crop diseases. Pest Manag Sci. 2023; 79( 1): 21– 36. doi:10.1002/ps.7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
102. Wang H , Liu R , You MP , Barbetti MJ , Chen Y . Pathogen biocontrol using plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR): role of bacterial diversity. Microorganisms. 2021; 9( 9): 1988. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9091988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
103. Micciulla JL , Shor LM , Gage DJ . Enhanced transport of bacteria along root systems by protists can impact plant health. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90( 4): e02011– 23. doi:10.1128/aem.02011-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
104. Valster RM , Wullings BA , Bakker G , Smidt H , van der Kooij D . Free-living protozoa in two unchlorinated drinking water supplies, identified by phylogenic analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75( 14): 4736– 46. doi:10.1128/AEM.02629-08. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
105. Burton EM , Knight JD . Survival of Penicillium bilaiae inoculated on canola seed treated with Vitavax RS and Extender. Biol Fertil Soils. 2005; 42( 1): 54– 9. doi:10.1007/s00374-005-0862-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
106. Aasfar A , Bargaz A , Yaakoubi K , Hilali A , Bennis I , Zeroual Y , et al. Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 628379. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
107. Du ZY , Alvaro J , Hyden B , Zienkiewicz K , Benning N , Zienkiewicz A , et al. Enhancing oil production and harvest by combining the marine Alga nannochloropsis oceanica and the oleaginous fungus Mortierella elongata. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018; 11( 1): 174. doi:10.1186/s13068-018-1172-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
108. Farooq MS , Uzair M , Maqbool Z , Fiaz S , Yousuf M , Yang SH , et al. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in aerobic rice based on insights into the ecophysiology of archaeal and bacterial ammonia oxidizers. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 913204. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.913204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
109. Samaras A , Roumeliotis E , Ntasiou P , Karaoglanidis G . Bacillus subtilis MBI600 promotes growth of tomato plants and induces systemic resistance contributing to the control of soilborne pathogens. Plants. 2021; 10( 6): 1113. doi:10.3390/plants10061113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
110. Ramakrishnan B , Maddela NR , Venkateswarlu K , Megharaj M . Potential of microalgae and cyanobacteria to improve soil health and agricultural productivity: a critical view. Environ Sci Adv. 2023; 2( 4): 586– 611. doi:10.1039/D2VA00158F. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
111. Yu Y , Gui Y , Li Z , Jiang C , Guo J , Niu D . Induced systemic resistance for improving plant immunity by beneficial microbes. Plants. 2022; 11( 3): 386. doi:10.3390/plants11030386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
112. Khan N , Ali S , Shahid MA , Mustafa A , Sayyed RZ , Curá JA . Insights into the interactions among roots, rhizosphere, and rhizobacteria for improving plant growth and tolerance to abiotic stresses: a review. Cells. 2021; 10( 6): 1551. doi:10.3390/cells10061551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
113. Soumare A , Diedhiou AG , Thuita M , Hafidi M , Ouhdouch Y , Gopalakrishnan S , et al. Exploiting biological nitrogen fixation: a route towards a sustainable agriculture. Plants. 2020; 9( 8): 1011. doi:10.3390/plants9081011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
114. Liu M , Philp J , Wang Y , Hu J , Wei Y , Li J , et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inhibits root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community. Sci Rep. 2022; 12( 1): 8381. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12472-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
115. Sah S , Krishnani S , Singh R . Pseudomonas mediated nutritional and growth promotional activities for sustainable food security. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2021; 2: 100084. doi:10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
116. Dimkić I , Janakiev T , Petrović M , Degrassi G , Fira D . Plant-associated Bacillus and Pseudomonas antimicrobial activities in plant disease suppression via biological control mechanisms—A review. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2022; 117: 101754. doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
117. Tyśkiewicz R , Nowak A , Ozimek E , Jaroszuk-Ściseł J . Trichoderma: the current status of its application in agriculture for the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens and stimulation of plant growth. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23( 4): 2329. doi:10.3390/ijms23042329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
118. Pacios-Michelena S , Aguilar González CN , Alvarez-Perez OB , Rodriguez-Herrera R , Chávez-González M , Arredondo Valdés R , et al. Application of Streptomyces Antimicrobial compounds for the control of phytopathogens. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021; 5: 696518. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.696518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
119. Fahde S , Boughribil S , Sijilmassi B , Amri A . Rhizobia: a promising source of plant growth-promoting molecules and their non-legume interactions: examining applications and mechanisms. Agriculture. 2023; 13( 7): 1279. doi:10.3390/agriculture13071279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
120. Papade SE , Mohapatra B , Phale PS . Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. capable of metabolizing aromatics displays multifarious plant growth promoting traits: insights on strategizing consortium-based application to agro-ecosystems. Environ Technol Innov. 2024; 36: 103786. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2024.103786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
121. Sharma P . Efficiency of bacteria and bacterial assisted phytoremediation of heavy metals: an update. Bioresour Technol. 2021; 328: 124835. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
122. Palanivel TM , Pracejus B , Novo LAB . Bioremediation of copper using indigenous fungi Aspergillus species isolated from an abandoned copper mine soil. Chemosphere. 2023; 314: 137688. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
123. Bhatt P , Gangola S , Bhandari G , Zhang W , Maithani D , Mishra S , et al. New insights into the degradation of synthetic pollutants in contaminated environments. Chemosphere. 2021; 268: 128827. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
124. Dinakarkumar Y , Ramakrishnan G , Gujjula KR , Vasu V , Balamurugan P , Murali G . Fungal bioremediation: an overview of the mechanisms, applications and future perspectives. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol. 2024; 6: 293– 302. doi:10.1016/j.enceco.2024.07.002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
125. Zeng J , Lin X , Zhang J , Li X . Isolation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)-degrading Mycobacterium spp. and the degradation in soil. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 183( 1–3): 718– 23. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
126. Akinola SA , Babalola OO . The fungal and archaeal community within plant rhizosphere: a review on their contribution to crop safety. J Plant Nutr. 2021; 44( 4): 600– 18. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1845376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
127. Zilli JÉ , Alves BJR , Rouws LFM , Simões-Araujo JL , de Barros Soares LH , Cassán F , et al. The importance of denitrification performed by nitrogen-fixing bacteria used as inoculants in South America. Plant Soil. 2020; 451( 1): 5– 24. doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04187-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
128. Yadav AN , Kour D , Kaur T , Devi R , Yadav A , Dikilitas M , et al. Biodiversity, and biotechnological contribution of beneficial soil microbiomes for nutrient cycling, plant growth improvement and nutrient uptake. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2021; 33: 102009. doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
129. Lamichhane JR , Barbetti MJ , Chilvers MI , Pandey AK , Steinberg C . Exploiting root exudates to manage soil-borne disease complexes in a changing climate. Trends Microbiol. 2024; 32( 1): 27– 37. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2023.07.011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
130. Hou J , Pugazhendhi A , Phuong TN , Thanh NC , Brindhadevi K , Velu G , et al. Plant resistance to disease: using biochar to inhibit harmful microbes and absorb nutrients. Environ Res. 2022; 214: 113883. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
131. Yang T , Lupwayi N , Marc SA , Siddique KHM , Bainard LD . Anthropogenic drivers of soil microbial communities and impacts on soil biological functions in agroecosystems. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2021; 27: e01521. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
132. Wu Q , Chen Y , Dou X , Liao D , Li K , An C , et al. Microbial fertilizers improve soil quality and crop yield in coastal saline soils by regulating soil bacterial and fungal community structure. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 949: 175127. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
133. Xie K , Sun M , Shi A , Di Q , Chen R , Jin D , et al. The application of tomato plant residue compost and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improves soil quality and enhances the ginger field soil bacterial community. Agronomy. 2022; 12( 8): 1741. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
134. Fang X , Yang Y , Zhao Z , Zhou Y , Liao Y , Guan Z , et al. Optimum nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium fertilizer application increased Chrysanthemum Growth and quality by reinforcing the soil microbial community and nutrient cycling function. Plants. 2023; 12( 23): 4062. doi:10.3390/plants12234062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
135. Pan W , Tang S , Zhou J , Liu M , Xu M , Kuzyakov Y , et al. Plant–microbial competition for amino acids depends on soil acidity and the microbial community. Plant Soil. 2022; 475( 1): 457– 71. doi:10.1007/s11104-022-05381-w. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
136. Wen T , Xie P , Liu H , Liu T , Zhao M , Yang S , et al. Tapping the rhizosphere metabolites for the prebiotic control of soil-borne bacterial wilt disease. Nat Commun. 2023; 14: 4497. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40184-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
137. Amaria W , Sinaga MS , Mutaqin KH , Supriadi , Widodo . Bacterial biocontrol potential against Rigidoporus microporus: hydrolytic enzyme activity and antibiotic inhibition. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2024; 23( 4): 289– 99. doi:10.1016/j.jssas.2023.12.006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
138. Nawaz T , Saud S , Gu L , Khan I , Fahad S , Zhou R . Cyanobacteria: harnessing the power of microorganisms for plant growth promotion, stress alleviation, and phytoremediation in the era of sustainable agriculture. Plant Stress. 2024; 11: 100399. doi:10.1016/j.stress.2024.100399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
139. Kumar S , Diksha , Sindhu SS , Kumar R . Biofertilizers: an ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022; 3: 100094. doi:10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
140. Rüger L , Feng K , Chen Y , Sun R , Sun B , Deng Y , et al. Responses of root architecture and the rhizosphere microbiome assembly of maize (Zea mays L.) to a soil texture gradient. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023; 181: 109026. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
141. Zhu J , Niu W , Zhang Z , Siddique KHM , Sun D , Yang R . Distinct roles for soil bacterial and fungal communities associated with the availability of carbon and phosphorus under aerated drip irrigation. Agric Water Manag. 2022; 274: 107925. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
142. Siebielec S , Siebielec G , Klimkowicz-Pawlas A , Gałązka A , Grządziel J , Stuczyński T . Impact of water stress on microbial community and activity in sandy and loamy soils. Agronomy. 2020; 10( 9): 1429. doi:10.3390/agronomy10091429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
143. Kong AYY , Scow KM , Córdova-Kreylos AL , Holmes WE , Six J . Microbial community composition and carbon cycling within soil microenvironments of conventional, low-input, and organic cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011; 43( 1): 20– 30. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
144. Gebauer L , Bouffaud ML , Ganther M , Yim B , Vetterlein D , Smalla K , et al. Soil texture, sampling depth and root hairs shape the structure of ACC deaminase bacterial community composition in maize rhizosphere. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 616828. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.616828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
145. Hou Y , Zeng W , Hou M , Wang Z , Luo Y , Lei G , et al. Responses of the soil microbial community to salinity stress in maize fields. Biology. 2021; 10( 11): 1114. doi:10.3390/biology10111114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
146. Wang M , Chen S , Chen L , Wang D . Responses of soil microbial communities and their network interactions to saline-alkaline stress in Cd-contaminated soils. Environ Pollut. 2019; 252( Pt B): 1609– 21. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
147. Abd Elnabi MK , Elkaliny NE , Elyazied MM , Azab SH , Elkhalifa SA , Elmasry S , et al. Toxicity of heavy metals and recent advances in their removal: a review. Toxics. 2023; 11( 7): 580. doi:10.3390/toxics11070580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
148. Tang S , Zhou J , Pan W , Sun T , Liu M , Tang R , et al. Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers on tea (Camellia sinensis) growth and fungal community. Appl Soil Ecol. 2023; 181: 104661. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
149. Philippot L , Chenu C , Kappler A , Rillig MC , Fierer N . The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024; 22( 4): 226– 39. doi:10.1038/s41579-023-00980-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
150. Peng Y , Chen Q , Guan CY , Yang X , Jiang X , Wei M , et al. Metal oxide modified biochars for fertile soil management: effects on soil phosphorus transformation, enzyme activity, microbe community, and plant growth. Environ Res. 2023; 231( Pt 3): 116258. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.116258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
151. Li J , Chen L , Zhang C , Ma D , Zhou G , Ning Q , et al. Combining rotary and deep tillage increases crop yields by improving the soil physical structure and accumulating organic carbon of subsoil. Soil Tillage Res. 2024; 244: 106252. doi:10.1016/j.still.2024.106252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
152. Farooqi ZUR , Qadir AA , Alserae H , Raza A , Mohy-Ud-Din W . Organic amendment-mediated reclamation and build-up of soil microbial diversity in salt-affected soils: fostering soil biota for shaping rhizosphere to enhance soil health and crop productivity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023; 30( 51): 109889– 920. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-30143-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
153. Wang H , Wang S , Wang R , Zhang Y , Wang X , Li J . Direct and indirect linkages between soil aggregates and soil bacterial communities under tillage methods. Geoderma. 2019; 354: 113879. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
154. Gamage A , Gangahagedara R , Gamage J , Jayasinghe N , Kodikara N , Suraweera P , et al. Role of organic farming for achieving sustainability in agriculture. Farming Syst. 2023; 1( 1): 100005. doi:10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
155. Zhang QC , Shamsi IH , Xu DT , Wang GH , Lin XY , Jilani G , et al. Chemical fertilizer and organic manure inputs in soil exhibit a vice versa pattern of microbial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012; 57: 1– 8. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
156. Ahmed A , He P , He P , Wu Y , He Y , Munir S . Environmental effect of agriculture-related manufactured nano-objects on soil microbial communities. Environ Int. 2023; 173: 107819. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2023.107819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
157. Tian XL , Wang CB , Bao XG , Wang P , Li XF , Yang SC , et al. Crop diversity facilitates soil aggregation in relation to soil microbial community composition driven by intercropping. Plant Soil. 2019; 436( 1): 173– 92. doi:10.1007/s11104-018-03924-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
158. Lu S , Lepo JE , Song HX , Guan CY , Zhang ZH . Increased rice yield in long-term crop rotation regimes through improved soil structure, rhizosphere microbial communities, and nutrient bioavailability in paddy soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2018; 54( 8): 909– 23. doi:10.1007/s00374-018-1315-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
159. Harman GE , Uphoff N . Symbiotic root-endophytic soil microbes improve crop productivity and provide environmental benefits. Scientifica. 2019; 2019: 9106395. doi:10.1155/2019/9106395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
160. Shu D , Banerjee S , Mao X , Zhang J , Cui W , Zhang W , et al. Conversion of monocropping to intercropping promotes rhizosphere microbiome functionality and soil nitrogen cycling. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 949: 174953. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
161. Zolghadr-Asli B , McIntyre N , Djordjevic S , Farmani R , Pagliero L . The sustainability of desalination as a remedy to the water crisis in the agriculture sector: an analysis from the climate-water-energy-food nexus perspective. Agric Water Manag. 2023; 286: 108407. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
162. Zhang L , Zhang WS , Meng QF , Hu YC , Schmidhalter U , Zhong CH , et al. Optimizing agronomic, environmental, health and economic performances in summer maize production through fertilizer nitrogen management strategies. Plants. 2023; 12( 7): 1490. doi:10.3390/plants12071490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
163. Gao R , Pan Z , Zhang J , Chen X , Qi Y , Zhang Z , et al. Optimal cooperative application solutions of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization for high crop yield and friendly environment in the semi-arid region of North China. Agric Water Manag. 2023; 283( C): 108326. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
164. Zia R , Nawaz MS , Siddique MJ , Hakim S , Imran A . Plant survival under drought stress: implications, adaptive responses, and integrated rhizosphere management strategy for stress mitigation. Microbiol Res. 2021; 242: 126626. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2020.126626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
165. Fan J , Lu X , Gu S , Guo X . Improving nutrient and water use efficiencies using water-drip irrigation and fertilization technology in Northeast China. Agric Water Manag. 2020; 241: 106352. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
166. Liu X , Wei Z , Ma Y , Liu J , Liu F . Effects of biochar amendment and reduced irrigation on growth, physiology, water-use efficiency and nutrients uptake of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) on two different soil types. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 770: 144769. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
167. Wang L , He Z , Zhao W , Wang C , Ma D . Fine soil texture is conducive to crop productivity and nitrogen retention in irrigated cropland in a desert-oasis ecotone, northwest China. Agronomy. 2022; 12( 7): 1509. doi:10.3390/agronomy12071509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
168. Zhang Y , Liu G , Dong H , Li C . Waterlogging stress in cotton: damage, adaptability, alleviation strategies, and mechanisms. Crop J. 2021; 9( 2): 257– 70. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2020.08.005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
169. Luo H , Wang Q , Zhang J , Wang L , Li Y , Yang G . Minimum fertilization at the appearance of the first flower benefits cotton nutrient utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 6815. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63692-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
170. Kumar R , Mishra JS , Rao KK , Mondal S , Hazra KK , Choudhary JS , et al. Crop rotation and tillage management options for sustainable intensification of rice-fallow agro-ecosystem in eastern India. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 11146. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67973-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
171. Zhang H , Luo G , Wang Y , Fei J , Rong X , Peng J , et al. Crop rotation-driven change in physicochemical properties regulates microbial diversity, dominant components, and community complexity in paddy soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023; 343: 108278. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2022.108278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
172. Oubaha B , Rathore RS , Bagri J , Singhal NK , Mazumdar K , Rishi V , et al. Bacillus siamensis strain BW enhances rice growth and salinity tolerance through redox equilibrium and hormone modulation. Curr Plant Biol. 2024; 37: 100321. doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2024.100321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
173. Jacoby RP , Kopriva S . Metabolic niches in the rhizosphere microbiome: new tools and approaches to analyse metabolic mechanisms of plant–microbe nutrient exchange. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70( 4): 1087– 94. doi:10.1093/jxb/ery438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
174. Qiao M , Sun R , Wang Z , Dumack K , Xie X , Dai C , et al. Legume rhizodeposition promotes nitrogen fixation by soil microbiota under crop diversification. Nat Commun. 2024; 15: 2924. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47159-x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
175. Liao L , Wang X , Wang J , Liu G , Zhang C . Nitrogen fertilization increases fungal diversity and abundance of saprotrophs while reducing nitrogen fixation potential in a semiarid grassland. Plant Soil. 2021; 465( 1): 515– 32. doi:10.1007/s11104-021-05012-w. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
176. Jalli M , Huusela E , Jalli H , Kauppi K , Niemi M , Himanen S , et al. Effects of crop rotation on spring wheat yield and pest occurrence in different tillage systems: a multi-year experiment in Finnish growing conditions. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021; 5: 647335. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.647335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
177. Zhang S , Li S , Meng L , Liu X , Zhang Y , Zhao S , et al. Root exudation under maize/soybean intercropping system mediates the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity and improves the plant growth. Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15: 1375194. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1375194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
178. Wyman EM , Grayburn WS , Gilbert MK , Lebar MD , Lohmar JM , Cary JW , et al. An environmental isolate of Pseudomonas, 20EI1, reduces Aspergillus flavus growth in an iron-dependent manner and alters secondary metabolism. Front Microbiol. 2025; 15: 1514950. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1514950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
179. Zhu Y , Xing Y , Li Y , Jia J , Ying Y , Shi W . The role of phosphate-solubilizing microbial interactions in phosphorus activation and utilization in plant-soil systems: a review. Plants. 2024; 13( 19): 2686. doi:10.3390/plants13192686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cite This Article
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
View Full Text
Download PDF
Downloads
Citation Tools