iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Identification of Informative Microsatellite Markers in the Avena Chloroplast Genome Provides New Insights into Oat Phylogeny

Svetlana Goryunova1,2,*, Margarita Lebedeva1, Aya Trifonova1, Denis Goryunov2,3, Anastasia Sivolapova2, Aleksey Troitsky3, Igor Loskutov4, Vitalii Pukhalskiy1

1 Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
2 Laboratory of Cell and Genomic Technologies, Russian Potato Research Center, Kraskovo, Russia
3 Department of Evolutional Biochemistry, Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
4 Department Genetic Resources of Oat, Barley, Rye, Federal Research Center N. I. Vavilov All-Russian Research Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), St. Petersburg, Russia

* Corresponding Author: Svetlana Goryunova. Email: email

Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany 2026, 95(6), 14 https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.077294

Abstract

Twenty-six cultivated and wild oat species with genomes of varying ploidy levels are currently known worldwide. The search for informative markers, as well as the analysis of variability and phylogeny of oat species, represents a key research directions with both fundamental and applied significance. Chloroplast microsatellites are promising markers for studying groups of closely related species, particularly in the context of allopolyploid origin analyses. The transferability of chloroplast microsatellite markers among species belonging to different “core pooids” supertribes within the Pooideae subfamily of Poaceae has been demonstrated. Following preliminary screening, twelve primer pairs were selected for further analysis. Using these markers, 70 samples representing 25 Avena species were evaluated. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 9, with an average genetic diversity value (H) of 0.479. Based on allele length variation, 45 haplotypes were distinguished. Considerable differences in gene diversity were observed among the oat species studied. The highest levels of polymorphism were detected in the diploid species A. eriantha and A. ventricosa (C-genome), one diploid species with the As-genome (A. atlantica), and the tetraploid species A. insularis (AC-genome) and A. agadiriana (AaBa-genome). The absence of 50 bp-deletion in the intergenic region ndhFrpl32 suggests that A. insularis is unlikely to be the maternal progenitor of hexaploid oats. Overall, this study enabled the identification of novel informative markers for the analysis of the Avena chloroplast genome and contributed to refining current understanding of phylogenetic relationships among oat species.

Keywords

Chloroplast microsatellite; phylogeny; Avena; intraspecific variability

1 Introduction

Avena L. is a genus within the Poaceae family that comprises 26 cultivated and wild species exhibiting different ploidy levels (diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid) [1]. Oat is an important food and forage crop known since ancient times. Recently, the crop has come under increasing scrutiny as a source of functional nutrition due to its numerous health benefits [2,3,4,5,6]. Oat’s grains have an interesting nutritional profile that includes high-quality protein, unsaturated fats, soluble fiber, polyphenolic compounds, and micronutrients [7]. Additionally, oats (Avena sativa L.) are used as therapeutic plants, particularly in dermatology [8]. Because of that, they serve as subjects of multifarious studies [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Significant efforts have been applied to oat breeding research [16,17,18].

Development of novel crop varieties requires accurate understanding of phylogenetic relationships as well as the introduction of wild relatives to breeding programs as donors of new traits. Therefore, the investigation of wild species and Avena phylogeny has not only theoretical but also important applied concerns. Avena genus species possess four primary genomes: A, B, C, and D. Currently, known oat species include diploids with A- and C-genomes, tetraploids with AB- and AC-genomes, and hexaploids with ACD-genome [19]. Recently, the role of genomic approaches in the investigation of Avena species has increased [20,21,22]. Nevertheless, the phylogenetic relationships among oat species remain unresolved. Therefore, the search for informative molecular markers and the analysis of variability within Avena species are still important.

Chloroplast loci are widely used in plant evolutionary studies; yet identifying informative plastid markers suitable for detecting polymorphism at low taxonomic levels can be challenging [23,24,25,26]. Recent research highlights a growing interest in the development of highly informative chloroplast microsatellite systems for various plant taxa, including woody perennials and ecologically specialized species. For example, Guo et al. (2022) developed and characterized cpSSR markers for tree peony, underscoring their utility in population-level analyses. Similarly, Hoang et al. (2025) successfully generated chloroplast microsatellite markers for Bruguiera hainesii, demonstrating the applicability of cpSSR approaches in non-model tropical plant species [27,28].

Chloroplast microsatellites, however, can effectively address this issue and often exhibit high levels of variability across different plant groups [24,29,30,31]. Moreover, chloroplast simple sequence repeat (cpSSR) markers possess several important characteristics, including haploidy, lack of recombination, and uniparental inheritance [32]. These features make cpSSRs promising markers for studying groups of closely related species, including analyses of allopolyploid origins. Their effectiveness in resolving fine-scale population structure has been demonstrated in several recent works; in particular, Xiong et al. (2022) applied chloroplast DNA sequences and cpSSR markers to elucidate phylogeographic patterns and intraspecific divergence in Elymus sibiricus, confirming the value of cpSSR markers for studies at both inter- and intrapopulation levels [33].

Due to the overall low substitution rate in the chloroplast genome, cpSSR markers can often be transferred across related species. Typically, they are transferable among species of the same genus or closely related genera [34,35,36]. However, there are examples of successful application of chloroplast microsatellite markers to more distantly related taxa. For instance, Diekmann et al. [37] developed cpSSR markers based on chloroplast genome sequences from multiple grass species (Gramineae) representing different subfamiliesand successfully applied these markers to the “core pooids” within the Pooideae subfamily. Similar cross-taxon transferability of cpSSR loci has been reported in other plant groups, further supporting the potential of plastid microsatellites for broad phylogenetic applications [27].

Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the possibility of applying microsatellite markers previously developed for the chloroplast genome analysis in wheat [38] to investigate intraspecific variability and clarify phylogenetic relationships within the genus Avena.

2 Materials and Methods

A total of 70 samples representing 25 species of the genus Avena were selected for analysis (Table 1). Only the narrowly distributed narrow-range species A. bruhnsiana, which is closely relatedto A. ventricosa and shares the same genome type (Cv), was not included in the study. The samples were obtained from the collection of the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR, St. Petersburg) and the Genbank of Plant Resources, Canada (PGRC, Saskatoon). Four accessions of different Avena species representing different genome types—A. damascena (Ad), A. hirtula (As), A. sativa (ACD), and A. clauda (Cp)—were used to test the primer pairs.

Table 1: Avena accessions studied and their haplotypes.

Avena SpeciesGenomeAccession CodeGeographic OriginVIR/PGRC Catalogue NumberHaplotype
A. longiglumis Durieu.Allg551 WIR 18811
lg596 WIR17712
lg534 WIR 871
A. damascena Raih. et BaumAddm55SyriaCN194583
dm56SyriaCN194593
dm57SyriaCN194573
A. prostrata Ladiz.Appr86 WIR 20554
A. canariensis Baum et FedakAccn121 WIR 2925
cn538 WIR 19166
cn134 WIR 20777
A. wiestii Steud.Asws16 WIR 2158
ws550 WIR 949
ws511 WIR 958
A. hirtula Lagas.Ashr531 WIR 38
hr139 WIR 203210
hr594 WIR 203411
A. atlantica BaumAsatl33MoroccoCN2587712
atl51MoroccoCN2589513
atr75MoroccoCN2584814
A. strigosa Schreb.Asstr77PortugalCN2576715
str127 WIR 519615
str129 WIR 524416
A. barbata Pott.ABbr588 WIR 17458
br589 WIR 18838
br591 WIR 611
A. vaviloviana Mordv.ABv514 WIR 48
v522 WIR 109
v600 WIR 7558
A. abyssinica Hoch.ABab512 WIR 148268
ab529 WIR 49728
ab541 WIR 116788
A. agadiriana Baum et FedakAaBaag530MoroccoWIR 207417
ag70MoroccoCN2586818
ag69MoroccoCN2582419
A. magna Murph. et Terr.ACmg64 WIR 178620
mg123 WIR 185221
mg545 WIR 210020
A. murphyi Ladiz.ACmr542 WIR 208822
mr507 WIR 198623
A. insularis Ladiz.ACins138Italy, Sicilyoriginal sampling24
ins136Italy, Sicilyoriginal sampling25
ins141_2Italy, Sicilyoriginal sampling26
A. fatua L.ACDft50Canarias, SpainCN2552927
ft95IraqCN1934528
ft96Eşfahān, IranCN2120029
A. occidentalis Durieu.ACDoc88 WIR 196830
oc89 WIR 196631
oc32 WIR 178532
A. sterilis L.ACDste90 WIR 51133
ste91 WIR 98029
ste92 WIR 14233
A. ludoviciana Durieu.ACDlud94 WIR 46133
lud34 WIR 200629
lud554Russia, Krasnodaroriginal sampling34
A. byzantina C. KochACDbz540 WIR 1110335
bz65 WIR 1335136
bz521_2 WIR 463329
A. sativa L.ACDsat515 WIR 693437
sat569 WIR 169434
sat570 WIR 594734
A. clauda Durieu.Cpcl71IranCN1920738
cl72IranCN1921739
cl73Nīnawá, IraqCN1922239
A. eriantha Durieu.Cper68AlgeriaCN1932940
er97Madrid, SpainCN7375541
er148IranCN1924942
A. ventricosa Balansa ex Coss.Cvvr52AlgeriaCN2140543
vr53CyprusCN2199244
vr54AzerbaijanCN3970644
A. macrostachya Balansa ex Coss. et DurieuCmCmm142 WIR 185645

Total DNA was extracted from individual plants using a modified CTAB protocol [39]. A total of 18 cpSSR markers from the study by Ishii et al. [38] were used for the analysis (Table 2). PCR analysis was performedllowing the approach of Ishii et al. [38] with minor modifications. Each PCR reaction (15 μL) contained 100 ng of template DNA, 1× reaction buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.2 μM of each primer, and 0.3 U of Taq polymerase (Dialat LTD). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and elongation at 72°C for 2 min; followed by a final extension at 72°C for 7 min.

Amplified products were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels using a 38 × 50 cm Bio-Rad SequiGen GT cell according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Invitrogen™ 10 bp DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used to estimate fragment sizes. DNA fragments were visualized by silver staining [40]. Analysis of samples representing different alleles for each marker was performed with replications to confirm allele scoring. Nei’s genetic diversity index (H) was calculated for each locus [41]. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) based on the Dice pairwise genetic similarity coefficient was performed using PAST software [42].

3 Results

3.1 Diversity of Chloroplast SSR Loci

Initially, 18 primer pairs developed by T. Ishii and colleagues [38] were tested using DNA templates from four oat species representing different genome types. PCR amplification with 12 of the 18 primer pairs revealed polymorphism among the oat samples analyzed (Table 2). These twelve primer pairs were subsequently used to assess chloroplast genome variability in 70 samples representing 25 Avena species.

Table 2: Chloroplast microsatellite markers used in the study.

MarkerChloroplast Genome RegionPolymorphism
WCt_1Intergenic region matK-5′trnKDetected
WCt_2Intergenic region psbI-trnSNo
WCt_3Intergenic region psbC-trnSDetected
WCt_4Intergenic region 5′trnG-tmTDetected
WCt_5Intergenic region petN-trnCDetected
WCt_6Intergenic region trnC-rpoBDetected
WCt_9Intergenic region atpI-atpHDetected
WCt_10Intron atpFDetected
WCt_11Intron atpFNo
WCt_12Intron ycf3Detected
WCt_13Intergenic region trnF-ndhJDetected
WCt_15Intergenic region psbE-petLNo
WCt_16Intergenic region psbE-petLDetected
WCt_17Intergenic region psbE-petLDetected
WCt_19Intergenic region rpl36-infANo
WCt_22Intergenic region rps8-rpl14No
WCt_23Intergenic region rpl14-rpl16No
WCt_24Intergenic region ndhF-rpl32Detected

Across the 12 analyzed loci, the number of alleles identified among the oat samples ranged from 2 to 9 per locus. The lowest allele numbers were detected for the intron sequences of atpF (WCt_10), and inf170ycf3 (WCt_12), which exhibited 2 and 3 alleles, respectively. The highest number of alleles (9) was observed at three loci: matK5′trnK (WCt_1), petNtrnC (WCt_5), and ndhFrpl32 (WCt_24). The gene diversity index (H) for individual loci ranged from 0.136 to 0.738, with an average value of 0.479. The lowest H value was recorded for the psbCtrnS locus (WCt_3), while the highest was found at the ndhFrpl32 locus (WCt_24) (Table 3).

Table 3: Genetic diversity of investigated Avena species within 12 chloroplast microsatellite loci.

Marker
Genetic diversity, HSpeciesWCt1WCt3WCt4WCt5WCt6WCt9WCt10WCt12WCt13WCt16WCt17WCt24
A. longiglumis0.440.000.000.440.000.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. damascena0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
A. prostrataNANANANANANANANANANANANA
A. canariensis0.000.000.000.440.000.000.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. wiestii0.000.000.440.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
A. hirtula0.440.000.000.440.440.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. atlantica0.440.000.000.670.670.670.000.440.000.000.440.44
A. strigosa0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. barbata0.440.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. vaviloviana0.000.000.440.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
A. abyssinica0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
A. agadiriana0.440.000.440.670.440.670.000.000.000.000.440.44
A. magna0.000.000.000.440.000.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. murphyi0.500.000.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
A. insularis0.440.000.440.440.440.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. fatua0.440.000.000.440.440.670.000.000.000.000.000.00
A. occidentalis0.000.000.440.440.440.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. sterilis0.000.000.000.000.440.000.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. ludoviciana0.440.000.000.440.440.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. byzantina0.670.000.000.000.440.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. sativa0.440.000.000.440.000.440.000.000.000.000.440.00
A. clauda0.000.000.000.000.440.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
A. eriantha0.440.000.440.440.440.440.000.000.440.440.440.44
A. ventricosa0.440.440.000.440.440.440.000.000.440.440.440.44
A. macrostachyaNANANANANANANANANANANANA
Total0.660.140.210.650.600.700.250.210.260.590.490.74
Number of alleles per marker945976236659

NA = Not Available.

The Avena species differed markedly in their levels of genetic diversity. For A. prostrata and A. macrostachya, only one sample per species was available; therefore, the gene diversity index was not calculated. The highest diversity was observed in the C-genome diploid species A. ventricosa and A. eriantha (H = 0.33). In contrast, another C-genome species, A. clauda, displayed considerably lower gene diversity (H = 0.04) (Table 4).

Table 4: Genetic diversity of Avena species.

SpeciesNumber of AccessionsNumber of HaplotypesAverage Gene Diversity, H
A. longiglumis320.148
A. damascena310
A. prostrata11NA
A. canariensis330.074
A. wiestii320.037
A. hirtula330.185
A. atlantica330.315
A. strigosa320.037
A. barbata320.074
A. vaviloviana320.037
A. abyssinica310
A. agadiriana330.296
A. magna320.111
A. murphyi220.083
A. insularis330.222
A. fatua330.167
A. occidentalis330.185
A. sterilis320.074
A. ludoviciana330.185
A. byzantina330.167
A. sativa320.148
A. clauda320.037
A. eriantha330.333
A. ventricosa320.333
A. macrostachya11NA

NA = Not Available.

Among A-genome species, A. atlantica (As-genome type) exhibited the highest gene diversity (H = 0.32). The lowest diversity values were detected in A. damascena (Adgenome), for which all three samples shared the same haplotype, and in A. strigosa and A. wiestii (each H = 0.04; As-genome). In A. canariensis (As-genome), the H value was relatively low (0.07), whereas in A. hirtula (As-genome) it reached 0.19.

All AB-genome species were substantially less polymorphic than A. agadiriana (AaBa-genome). The genetic diversity index for A. agadiriana was 0.30, while A. barbata and A. vaviloviana (both AB-genome) showed values of 0.07 and 0.04, respectively. No polymorphism was detected among the analyzed samples of A. abyssinica (AB-genome).

For A. insularis (AC-genome), the H value was 0.22, whereas A. magna and A. murphyi, which share the same genome type, exhibited lower values of 0.11 and 0.08, respectively. Among hexaploids, A. sterilis showed the lowest diversity (H = 0.07); in the remaining species, H ranged from 0.15 to 0.19 (Table 4).

Based on allele length variation, a total of 45 haplotypes were identified among the 70 samples based on allele length variation. Most samples were therefore characterized by unique haplotypes (Table 1). Identical haplotypes were detected in several cases: among samples of the same species (e.g., A. damascena, A. longiglumis, A. magna, A. clauda, A. ventricosa, A. strigosa); among species sharing the same genome type (haplotype 8 in A. wiestii and A. hirtula, both As-genome; haplotypes 29, 33, 34 in hexaploid ACD-genome species); and between polyploid species and their diploid progenitors (haplotypes 8, 9, 11 shared by diploid As-genome species and AB-genome tetraploids).

3.2 Genetic Relationship Inferred from cpSSR Markers

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was performed, and a scatter plot was constructed (Fig. 1). The resulting clustering corresponded well to the genomic composition of the species. Three major groups were distinguishable:1—a single sample of A. macrostachya (CmCm-genome); 2—a group of diploid C-genome species; 3—a group comprising diploid species of various A-genome types, tetraploid species with AB- and AC-genomes, and hexaploid species with the ACDgenome.

images

Figure 1: A multidimensional scaling plot of Avena cpSRR data. Symbols: red plus—A. macrostachya accession (CmCmgenome); filled gray diamonds—Cp-genome species accessions; gray rectangles—accessions of A. ventricosa (Cv-genome); blue triangles—accessions of A. longiglumis (Al-genome); black dots—accessions of A. damascena (Ad-genome); blue square—A. prostrata (Ap-genome) accession; filled pink squares—accessions of A. canariensis (Ac-genome); green Xs—As-genome species accessions; blue stars—AB-genome species accessions; violet rings—accessions of A. agadiriana (AaBa-genome); light green diamonds—AC-genome species accessions; filled yellow triangles—ACD-genome species accessions.

For a more detailed assessment of “the third group”, it was analyzed separately. As shown in Fig. 2, samples of A. agadiriana (AaBa-genome) (Group 3-1) form the most distinct cluster. The remaining samples separate into two groups. The first includes diploid species with the As-genome and tetraploid species A. barbata, A. vaviloviana, and A. abyssinica with the AB-genome (Group 3-2).

The last group—Group 3-3-comprises diploid species A. prostrata (Ap-genome), A. damascena (Ad-genome), A. longiglumis (Al-genome), A. canariensis (Ac-genome), as well as tetraploid species with the AC-genome and hexaploid species with the ACD-genome (Fig. 2).

images

Figure 2: Scatter plot of Avena accessions with A-, AB-, AC- and ACD-genomes based on multidimensional scaling of cpSRR data. Symbols: violet rings—A. agadiriana accessions (AaBa-genome); green Xs—As-genome species accessions; blue stars—AB-genome species accessions; blue triangles—accessions of A. longiglumis (Al-genome); black dots—A. damascene accessions (Ad-genome); blue square—A. prostrata accession (Ap-genome); filled pink squares—accessions of A. canariensis (Ac-genome); light green diamonds—AC-genome species accessions; filled yellow triangles—accessions of ACD-genome species.

In the intergenic region ndhF-rpl32, an extended deletion was identified that was typical for all samples of the tetraploid species A. magna and A. murphyi with AC-genome and all samples of hexaploid species with ACD-genome (Fig. 3). In contrast, samples of another tetraploid species A. insularis with an AC-genome, did not possess this deletion.

images

Figure 3: Length polymorphism of ndhF-rpl32 region in Avena accessions. The first and the last tracks (L)—10 bp DNA ladder. a—diploid Avena accessions with C-genome and A. macrostachya accession with CmCm-genome; b—hexaploid Avena accessions with ACD-genome; c—A. insularis accessions with AC-genome; d—A. magna, A. murphyi accessions with AC-genome; e—diploid Avena accessions with A-genome and tetraploid Avena accessions with AB- and AaBa-genome.

4 Discussion

Eighteen primer pairs developed by T. Ishii and colleagues [38] to study microsatellite variability in wheat were tested for their applicability to various Avena species. Although wheat and oats belong to different supertribes within the Pooideae subfamily of Poaceae, and their most recent common ancestor (MRCA) is estimated at 33.5 million years ago [43], twelve of the eighteen molecular markers proved suitable for use in Avena. Further analysis identified the most informative loci: matK5′trnK, petNtrnC, and ndhFrpl32, which can be employed to evaluate chloroplast genome polymorphism across large sets of Avena samples.

Considerable differences in gene diversity were observed among the studied oat species. The most polymorphic species were the C-genome diploids A. eriantha and A. ventricosa, the As-genome diploid A. atlantica, and the tetraploids A. agadiriana (AaBa-genome) and A. insularis (AC-genome).

Interestingly, A. atlantica has a relatively narrow distribution, being endemic to the Moroccan coast [44]. Despite its limited area, its gene diversity (H = 0.32) exceeded that of more widely distributed A-genome diploids such as A. longiglumis, A. wiestii, and A. hirtula. For A. canariensis, which is also narrowly distributed (Spain, Canary Islands, Fuenteventura), had a H value of only 0.07, while A. damascena (Syria, Damascus region and Morocco) exhibited no diversity (H = 0).

Among AB-genome tetraploids, A. abyssinica showed no variation among samples, reflecting its restricted distribution in Ethiopia. In contrast, A. barbata, which has a much wider range [44], exhibited the highest polymorphism among AB-genome species (H = 0.07). Another narrow-range AB-genome species, A. vaviloviana, had an intermediate diversity value (H = 0.04). Overall, AB-genome species displayed low polymorphism with very small differences among them. Earlier cytogenetic and molecular studies also reported distinct similarity among A. abyssinica, A. barbata, and A. vaviloviana [45,46].

The autotetraploid A. macrostachya appeared as the most isolated species on the scattergram, consistent with its pronounced morphophysiological differences from other oats. It is the only perennial and cross-pollinated Avena species and has been placed in a separate subgenus, Avenastrum [1,44]. Previous studies have also highlighted considerable genomic differences between A. macrostachya and other Avena species. On one hand, it possesses metacentric chromosomes similar to A-genome species [19,47,48]; on the other hand, meiosis in interspecific hybrids, banding patterns, and comparative analyses of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences indicate closer affinity to C-genome species [47,49,50,51,52,53].

Our results demonstrate marked differences between the chloroplast genomes of C-genome diploids and those of oat species with other genome types. Samples of diploid A-genome species, tetraploids with AB-, AaBa-, and AC-genomes, and hexaploids with the ACD-genome cluster together on the scattergram, whereas C-genome diploid species are distinctly separated. These findings are consistent with previous reports indicating different cytoplasm types in A- and C-genome diploids and support the hypothesis that the cytoplasmic genome of polyploid Avena species was derived from A-genome diploids [54,55,56,57,58].

Within the group of samples with A-type cytoplasm, those of A. agadiriana (AaBa-genome) were the most isolated. Notably, our findings do not support Fu’s [54] observation of a closer relationship between the chloroplast genomes of A. agadiriana and A. longiglumis (AlAl). In the scattergram based on chloroplast microsatellite loci, these species form separate clusters. The origin of the A. agadiriana genome remains unclear. Previous comparisons of its chromosomes with the karyotypes of diploid Avena species bearing different A-genome variants suggested that one of its ancestors could be A. damascena [45]. However, in our study, the haplotypes of A. agadiriana differed markedly from those of A. damascena and other species. As noted above, A. agadiriana also exhibited high polymorphism. The observed remarkable intraspecific diversity in its chloroplast genome sequences is consistent with previous reports of high nuclear genome polymorphism in this species [59,60,61,62]. Considering the relative conservatism of the chloroplast genome, the pronounced differences of A. agadiriana from other oat species, and its considerable intraspecific variation, it is possible that this species originated in ancient times, involving a currently unknown primitive A-genomic diploid as the cytoplasm donor.

Based on karyotype differences and analyses of chromosome pairing in F1 hybrids, genome A has been subdivided into several types, denoted by the letter “A” with the following indices: As, Ap, Al, Ac, and Ad [19,63,64,65,66]. According to our data, the chloroplast genomes of species with different A-genome types also differ considerably. Diploid A-genome species are divided into two groups. The first group includes diploid species A. wiestii, A. hirtula, A. atlantica, and A. strigosa (As-genome), together with tetraploid species A. barbata, A. vaviloviana, and A. abyssinica (AB-genome). The second group includes diploid species A. prostrata (Ap-genome), A. damascena (Ad-genome), A. longiglumis (Al-genome), and A. canariensis (Ac-genome), as well as tetraploid species with AC-genomes and hexaploid species with the ACD-genome.

The observed similarity of haplotypes among the AB-genome tetraploid species A. abyssinica, A. barbata, and A. vaviloviana with those of diploid As-genome species supports the hypothesis that the ancestor of these tetraploids was a diploid species from the As-genome group. Previous studies [19,67,68,69,70] also support the origin of A. abyssinica, A. barbata, and A. vaviloviana from As-genome diploids. Notably, seven of the nine analyzed AB-genome samples shared haplotype 8, which was also present in two of three A. wiestii samples and in the A. hirtula sample—both diploid As-genome species. Sample v522 of A. vaviloviana had haplotype 9, also detected in sample ws550 of A. wiestii, and sample br591 of A. barbata carried haplotype 11, also found in sample hr594 of A. hirtula. Consequently, no species-specific haplotypes were identified for AB-genome tetraploids; all analyzed samples possessed haplotypes shared with the diploid As-genome species A. wiestii and A. hirtula, which are likely the maternal progenitors of these tetraploids. The absence of species-specific haplotypes also suggests a relatively recent origin for this tetraploid group.

The similarity of haplotypes between tetraploid and hexaploid species with AC and ACDgenomes and diploid species with Ap-, Al-, Ac-, and Ad-genomes aligns with previous findings, supporting the derivation of the cytoplasm of ACgenome tetraploids from A-genome diploids and the cytoplasmic genome of hexaploid oats from ACgenome tetraploids [56,57,58,68,71,72]. However, the direct ancestor and exact cytoplasm donor of hexaploid oat species remain unknown. Following the description of Avena magna in 1968, it was considered the most likely ancestor of cultivated hexaploid oats [73]. After the discovery of A. insularis in 1998, chromosome pairing and hybridization studies with A. sativa as well as FISH-analysis suggested that A. insularis was closer to hexaploids than any other known tetraploid [74,75].

Our results, however, do not support this assumption. In the intergenic region ndhF–rpl32, an extended deletion of approximately 50 bp was detected, which is typical for all samples of the tetraploid species A. magna and A. murphyi (AC-genome) and all hexaploid ACDgenome species (Fig. 3). In contrast, A. insularis samples, as well as all diploid A-genome species, lacked this deletion. This deletion does not appear to be a microsatellite variant but rather another type of indel mutation. Because such a deletion represents a rare evolutionary event, it is highly unlikely to have occurred independently in different species. Therefore, A. insularis is likely the most primitive among AC-genome tetraploids and cannot be the direct maternal ancestor of hexaploid species. A. magna and A. murphyi likely share a common ancestor, and hexaploid oat species may have descended from one of these tetraploids or their shared ancestor. The antiquity of A. insularis among AC-genome tetraploids is further supported by its high genetic diversity.

It is also noteworthy that the chloroplast microsatellite markers used in this study were more informative than those used by Li and colleagues [76], with an average of 5.9 alleles per locus compared to 3.2 in their study. Our findings do not confirm Li et al.’s hypothesis that different diploid species could serve as cytoplasmic donors for various AC- and ACD-genome species.

5 Conclusion

This study demonstrates the possibility of transferring of chloroplast microsatellite markers between species belonging to different “core pooids” supertribes within the Pooideae subfamily (Poaceae). The most polymorphic species were the C-genome diploids A. eriantha and A. ventricosa, the As-genome diploid A. atlantica, and the tetraploids A. insularis (AC-genome) and A. agadiriana (AaBa-genome). Although A. insularis is often considered the species most closely related to hexaploid oats, it is likely the most primitive among tetraploid species with an AC genome and cannot be the direct maternal ancestor of hexaploid species. The absence of species-specific haplotypes in tetraploid species with an AB- genome suggest a recent origin for this group. The most possible maternal donors of these tetraploids are the the As-genome diploid species A. wiestii and A. hirtula. In contrast, A. agadiriana with the AaBa-genome, differed markedly from other oat species, this, together with the notably high level of intraspecific variation observed, may indicate the ancient origin for this species. Overall, this study identified new informative chloroplast markers for the genus Avena and provided further insights into the phylogenetic relationships among oat species.

Acknowledgement: We are grateful to Dr. Ekaterina Badaeva and Dr. Olga Shelukhina for the valuable discussion.

Funding Statement: The study was conducted under the state assignment of Vavilov Institute of general Genetics (125040704886-1) and Lomonosov Moscow State University (123063000008-9).

Author Contributions: The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: conceptualization, Svetlana Goryunova, Vitalii Pukhalskiy; resources, Igor Loskutov; investigation, Svetlana Goryunova and Aya Trifonova; data analysis, Svetlana Goryunova. and Margarita Lebedeva, visualization, Aya Trifonova and Aleksey Troitsky; writing—original draft, Svetlana Goryunova, Denis Goryunov and Anastasia Sivolapova, writing—review and editing, Vitalii Pukhalskiy, Igor Loskutov and Aleksey Troitsky. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Availability of Data and Materials: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Ethics Approval: Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Loskutov IG , Rines HW . Avena. In: Kole C , editor. Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2011. p. 109– 83. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4_3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

2. Song S , Lee YM , Lee YY , Yeum KJ . Oat (Avena sativa) extract against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in human keratinocytes. Molecules. 2021; 26( 18): 5564. doi:10.3390/molecules26185564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

3. Jibril AT , Arero AG , Kankam SB , Fuseini M . Effect of Avena sativa (Oats) on cognitive function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023; 53: 144– 50. doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.12.011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

4. Li L , Zhang R , Hu Y , Deng H , Pei X , Liu F , et al. Impact of oat (Avena sativa L.) on metabolic syndrome and potential physiological mechanisms of action: a current review. J Agric Food Chem. 2023; 71( 41): 14838– 52. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

5. Amerizadeh A , Ghaheh HS , Vaseghi G , Farajzadegan Z , Asgary S . Effect of oat (Avena sativa L.) consumption on lipid profile with focus on triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C): an updated systematic review. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023; 48( 7): 101153. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

6. Wankhede NL , Kale MB , Bawankule AK , Aglawe MM , Taksande BG , Trivedi RV , et al. Overview on the polyphenol avenanthramide in oats (Avena sativa Linn.) as regulators of PI3K signaling in the management of neurodegenerative diseases. Nutrients. 2023; 15( 17): 3751. doi:10.3390/nu15173751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

7. Alemayehu GF , Forsido SF , Tola YB , Amare E . Nutritional and phytochemical composition and associated health benefits of oat (Avena sativa) grains and oat-based fermented food products. Sci World J. 2023; 2023: 2730175. doi:10.1155/2023/2730175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

8. Kim HS , Hwang HJ , Seo WD , Do SH . Oat (Avena sativa L.) sprouts restore skin barrier function by modulating the expression of the epidermal differentiation complex in models of skin irritation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24( 24): 17274. doi:10.3390/ijms242417274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

9. Ling L , Li M , Chen N , Ren G , Qu L , Yue H , et al. Genome-wide analysis and expression of the GRAS transcription factor family in Avena sativa. Genes. 2023; 14( 1): 164. doi:10.3390/genes14010164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

10. Liu K , Ju Z , Jia Z , Liang G , Ma X , Liu W . Genome-wide identification and characterization of the oat (Avena sativa L.) WRKY transcription factor family. Genes. 2022; 13( 10): 1918. doi:10.3390/genes13101918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

11. Li D , Chen M , Meng X , Sun Y , Liu R , Sun T . Extraction, purification, structural characteristics, bioactivity and potential applications of polysaccharides from Avena sativa L.: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024; 265( Pt 2): 130891. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

12. Guo Y , Tang K , Yao T , Zhang J , Liu Y , Meng J , et al. Sphingosinicella rhizophila sp. nov., isolated from oat (Avena sativa L.) rhizosphere soil. Curr Microbiol. 2025; 82( 4): 163. doi:10.1007/s00284-025-04124-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

13. Deng G , Nagy C , Yu P . Combined molecular spectroscopic techniques (SR-FTIR, XRF, ATR-FTIR) to study physiochemical and nutrient profiles of Avena sativa grain and nutrition and structure interactive association properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023; 63( 25): 7225– 37. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2045470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

14. Oveisi M , Sikuljak D , Anđelković AA , Bozic D , Trkulja N , Piri R , et al. Application of artificial neural networks to classify Avena fatua and Avena sterilis based on seed traits: insights from European Avena populations primarily from the Balkan Region. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24( 1): 537. doi:10.1186/s12870-024-05266-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

15. Stefanello R , Puntel RT , da Silva Garcia WJ , Strazzabosco Dorneles L . Mitigating salt stress by conditioning seeds with ultraviolet light (UV-C) in white oats (Avena sativa L.). J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 2024; 87( 13): 533– 40. doi:10.1080/15287394.2024.2345878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

16. Tinker NA , Wight CP , Bekele WA , Yan W , Jellen EN , Renhuldt NT , et al. Genome analysis in Avena sativa reveals hidden breeding barriers and opportunities for oat improvement. Commun Biol. 2022; 5( 1): 474. doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03256-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

17. Wen G , Ma BL , Shi Y , Liu K , Chen W . Selection of oat (Avena sativa L.) drought-tolerant genotypes based on multiple yield-associated traits. J Sci Food Agric. 2023; 103( 9): 4380– 91. doi:10.1002/jsfa.12504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

18. Brzozowski LJ , Campbell MT , Hu H , Yao L , Caffe M , Gutiérrez L , et al. Genomic prediction of seed nutritional traits in biparental families of oat (Avena sativa). Plant Genome. 2023; 16( 4): e20370. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

19. Rajhathy T , Thomas H . Cytogenetics of oats (Avena L.). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Genetics Society of Canada; 1974. [Google Scholar]

20. Liu Q , Yuan H , Xu J , Cui D , Xiong G , Schwarzacher T , et al. The mitochondrial genome of the diploid oat Avena longiglumis. BMC Plant Biol. 2023; 23( 1): 218. doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04217-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

21. Zhang H , Liu N , Wang Y , Zheng X , Li W , Liu Z , et al. Super-pangenome analyses across 35 accessions of 23 Avena species highlight their complex evolutionary history and extensive genomic diversity. Nat Genet. 2025; 57( 9): 2276– 88. doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02294-z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

22. Liu Q , Xiong G , Wang Z , Wu Y , Tu T , Schwarzacher T , et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the diploid oat species Avena longiglumis. Sci Data. 2024; 11( 1): 412. doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03248-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

23. Daniell H , Lin CS , Yu M , Chang WJ . Chloroplast genomes: diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol. 2016; 17( 1): 134. doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1004-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

24. Provan J , Powell W , Hollingsworth PM . Chloroplast microsatellites: new tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16( 3): 142– 7. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02097-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

25. Schaal BA , Hayworth DA , Olsen KM , Rauscher JT , Smith WA . Phylogeographic studies in plants: problems and prospects. Mol Ecol. 1998; 7( 4): 465– 74. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00318.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

26. Shaw J , Lickey EB , Beck JT , Farmer SB , Liu W , Miller J , et al. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am J Botany. 2005; 92( 1): 142– 66. doi:10.3732/ajb.92.1.142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

27. Guo Q , Guo L , Li Y , Yang H , Hu X , Song C , et al. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers based on the chloroplast genome of tree peony. Genes. 2022; 13( 9): 1543. doi:10.3390/genes13091543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

28. Hoang TTT , Pham VD , Pham MP , Dang NH , Le XD , Vu DD . Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for Bruguiera hainesii C.G. Rogers (Rhizophoraceae) in the Con Dao National Park, Ba Ria—Vung Tau Province, Vietnam. J Trop Sci Eng. 2025; 37: 21– 34. doi:10.58334/vrtc.jtst.n37.02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

29. Arroyo-García R , Lefort F , de Andrés MT , Ibáñez J , Borrego J , Jouve N , et al. Chloroplast microsatellite polymorphisms in Vitis species. Genome. 2002; 45( 6): 1142– 9. doi:10.1139/g02-087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

30. Desiderio F , Bitocchi E , Bellucci E , Rau D , Rodriguez M , Attene G , et al. Chloroplast microsatellite diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 3: 312. doi:10.3389/fpls.2012.00312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

31. Park H , Kim C , Lee YM , Kim JH . Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for the endangered Maianthemum bicolor (Asparagaceae s.l.). Appl Plant Sci. 2016; 4( 8): 1600032. doi:10.3732/apps.1600032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

32. Ebert D , Peakall R . Chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs): technical resources and recommendations for expanding cpSSR discovery and applications to a wide array of plant species. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009; 9( 3): 673– 90. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02319.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

33. Xiong Y , Xiong Y , Shu X , Yu Q , Lei X , Li D , et al. Molecular phylogeography and intraspecific divergences in Siberian wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.) wild populations in China, inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence and cpSSR markers. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 862759. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.862759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

34. Deng Q , Zhang H , He Y , Wang T , Su Y . Chloroplast microsatellite markers for Pseudotaxus chienii developed from the whole chloroplast genome of Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Taxaceae). Appl Plant Sci. 2017; 5( 3): 1600153. doi:10.3732/apps.1600153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

35. Pan L , Li Y , Guo R , Wu H , Hu Z , Chen C . Development of 12 chloroplast microsatellite markers in Vigna unguiculata (Fabaceae) and amplification in Phaseolus vulgaris. Appl Plant Sci. 2014; 2( 3): 1300075. doi:10.3732/apps.1300075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

36. Saxena S , Kaila T , Chaduvula PK , Singh A , Singh NK , Gaikwad K . Novel chloroplast microsatellite markers in pigeonpea (Cajanus Cajan L. Millsp.) and their transferability to wild Cajanus species. Aust J Crop Sci. 2019; 13( 2): 185– 91. doi:10.21475/ajcs.19.13.02.p877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

37. Diekmann K , Hodkinson TR , Barth S . New chloroplast microsatellite markers suitable for assessing genetic diversity of Lolium perenne and other related grass species. Ann Bot. 2012; 110( 6): 1327– 39. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

38. Ishii T , Mori N , Ogihara Y . Evaluation of allelic diversity at chloroplast microsatellite loci among common wheat and its ancestral species. Theor Appl Genet. 2001; 103( 6): 896– 904. doi:10.1007/s001220100715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

39. Torres AM , Weeden NF , Martín A . Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theor Appl Genet. 1993; 85( 8): 937– 45. doi:10.1007/BF00215032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

40. Bassam BJ , Gresshoff PM . Silver staining DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2( 11): 2649– 54. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

41. Nei M . Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press; 1987. doi:10.7312/nei-92038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

42. Hammer O , Harper DAT , Ryan PD . PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001; 4( 1): 9. [Google Scholar]

43. Pimentel M , Escudero M , Sahuquillo E , Minaya MÁ , Catalán P . Are diversification rates and chromosome evolution in the temperate grasses (Pooideae) associated with major environmental changes in the Oligocene-Miocene? PeerJ. 2017; 5: e3815. doi:10.7717/peerj.3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

44. Loskutov IG . Oat (Avena L.). Distribution, taxonomy, evolution and breeding value. Saint-Petersburg, Russia: SSC RF VIR; 2007. [Google Scholar]

45. Badaeva ED , Shelukhina OY , Goryunova SV , Loskutov IG , Pukhalskiy VA . Phylogenetic relationships of tetraploid AB-genome Avena species evaluated by means of cytogenetic (C-banding and FISH) and RAPD analyses. J Bot. 2010; 2010: 742307. doi:10.1155/2010/742307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

46. Fominaya A , Vega C , Ferrer E . C-banding and nucleolar activity of tetraploid Avena species. Genome. 1988; 30( 5): 633– 8. doi:10.1139/g88-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

47. Badaeva ED , Shelukhina OY , Diederichsen A , Loskutov IG , Pukhalskiy VA . Comparative cytogenetic analysis of Avena macrostachya and diploid C-genome Avena species. Genome. 2010; 53( 2): 125– 37. doi:10.1139/G09-089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

48. Loskutov IG . On evolutionary pathways of Avena species. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2008; 55( 2): 211– 20. doi:10.1007/s10722-007-9229-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

49. Leggett JM . A new triploid hybrid between Avena eriantha and A. macrostachya. Cereal Res Commun. 1990; 18( 1/2): 97– 101. [Google Scholar]

50. Leggett JM . Further hybrids involving the perennial autotetraploid oat Avena macrostachya. Genome. 1992; 35( 2): 273– 5. doi:10.1139/g92-042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

51. Leggett JM , Markhand GS . The genomic structure of Avena revealed by GISH. In: Brandham PE , Bennett MD , editors. Kew Chromosome Conference IV. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1995. p. 133– 9. [Google Scholar]

52. Pohler W , Hoppe HD . Homeology between the chromosomes of Avena macrostachya and the Avena C genome. Plant Breed. 1991; 106( 3): 250– 3. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1991.tb00508.x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

53. Rodionov AV , Tyupa NB , Kim ES , Machs EM , Loskutov IG . Genomic configuration of the autotetraploid oat species Avena macrostachya inferred from comparative analysis of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences: on the oat karyotype evolution during the early events of the Avena species divergence. Russ J Genet. 2005; 41( 5): 518– 28. doi:10.1007/s11177-005-0120-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

54. Fu YB . Oat evolution revealed in the maternal lineages of 25 Avena species. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 4252. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22478-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

55. Murai K , Tsunewaki K . Phylogenetic relationships between Avena Species revealed by the restriction endonuclease analysis of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNAs. In: Lawes DA , Thomas H , editors. Proceedings of the Second International Oats Conference; 1985 Jul 15–18; Aberystwyth, UK. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 1986. p. 34– 8. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4408-4_7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

56. Murai K , Tsunewaki K . Chloroplast genome evolution in the genus Avena. Genetics. 1987; 116( 4): 613– 21. doi:10.1093/genetics/116.4.613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

57. Peng YY , Wei YM , Baum BR , Jiang QT , Lan XJ , Dai SF , et al. Phylogenetic investigation of Avena diploid species and the maternal genome donor of Avena polyploids. Taxon. 2010; 59( 5): 1472– 82. doi:10.1002/tax.595012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

58. Rines HW , Gengenbach BG , Boylan KL , Storey KK . Mitochondrial DNA diversity in oat cultivars and species. Crop Sci. 1988; 28( 1): 171– 6. doi:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800010037x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

59. Hayasaki M , Morikawa T , Leggett JM . Intraspecific variation of 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA sites revealed by FISH and RFLP in wild oat, Avena agadiriana. Genes Genet Syst. 2001; 76( 1): 9– 14. doi:10.1266/ggs.76.9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

60. Jellen EN , Gill BS . C-banding variation in the Moroccan oat species Avena agadiriana (2n = 4x = 28). Theor Appl Genet. 1996; 92( 6): 726– 32. doi:10.1007/BF00226095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

61. Leggett JM . Inter-and intra-specific hybrids involving the tetraploid species Avena agadiriana Baum et Fedak sp. nov. (2n = 4x = 28) [chromosome pairing]. In: Proceedings of the 3 International Oat Conference. Lund, Sweden: Svaloef AB; 1989. [Google Scholar]

62. Morikawa T , Leggett JM . Isozyme polymorphism and genetic differentiation in natural populations of a new tetraploid species Avena agadiriana, from Morocco. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2005; 52( 4): 363– 70. doi:10.1007/s10722-005-2248-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

63. Ladizinsky G , Zohary D . Notes on species delimination, species relationships and polyploidy in Avena L. Euphytica. 1971; 20( 3): 380– 95. doi:10.1007/BF00035663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

64. Leggett JM . Interspecific diploid hybrids in Avena. Genome. 1989; 32( 2): 346– 8. doi:10.1139/g89-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

65. Rajhathy T , Baum BR . Avena damascena: a new diploid oat species. Can J Genet Cytol. 1972; 14( 3): 645– 54. doi:10.1139/g72-079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

66. Thomas H . Cytogenetics of Avena. In: Marshall HG , Sorrells ME , editors. Agronomy monographs. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 1992. p. 473– 507. [cited 2025 Nov 16]. Available from: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/agronmonogr33.c14. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr33.c14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

67. Drossou A , Katsiotis A , Leggett JM , Loukas M , Tsakas S . Genome and species relationships in genus Avena based on RAPD and AFLP molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 109( 1): 48– 54. doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1615-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

68. Fu YB , Williams DJ . AFLP variation in 25 Avena species. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 117( 3): 333– 42. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0778-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

69. Rajhathy T , Morrison JW . Chromosome morphology in the genus Avena. Can J Bot. 1959; 37( 3): 331– 7. doi:10.1139/b59-024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

70. Sadasivaiah RS , Rajhathy T . Genome relationships in tetraploid AVENA. Can J Genet Cytol. 1968; 10( 3): 655– 69. doi:10.1139/g68-083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

71. Nikoloudakis N , Katsiotis A . The origin of the C-genome and cytoplasm of Avena polyploids. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 117( 2): 273– 81. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0772-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

72. Yan HH , Baum BR , Zhou PP , Zhao J , Wei YM , Ren CZ , et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Avena based on chloroplast intergenic spacer psbA–trnH and single-copy nuclear gene Acc1. Genome. 2014; 57( 5): 267– 77. doi:10.1139/gen-2014-0075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

73. Murphy HC , Sadanaga K , Zillinsky FJ , Terrell EE , Smith RT . Avena magna: an important new tetraploid species of oats. Science. 1968; 159( 3810): 103– 4. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

74. Fominaya A , Loarce Y , González JM , Ferrer E . Cytogenetic evidence supports Avena insularis being closely related to hexaploid oats. PLoS One. 2021; 16( 10): e0257100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

75. Ladizinsky G . A new species of Avena from Sicily, possibly the tetraploid progenitor of hexaploid oats. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 1998; 45( 3): 263– 9. doi:10.1023/A:1008657530466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

76. Li WT , Peng YY , Wei YM , Baum BR , Zheng YL . Relationships among Avena species as revealed by consensus chloroplast simple sequence repeat (ccSSR) markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2009; 56( 4): 465– 80. doi:10.1007/s10722-008-9379-x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

×

Cite This Article

APA Style
Goryunova, S., Lebedeva, M., Trifonova, A., Goryunov, D., Sivolapova, A. et al. (2026). Identification of Informative Microsatellite Markers in the Avena Chloroplast Genome Provides New Insights into Oat Phylogeny. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 95(6), 14. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.077294
Vancouver Style
Goryunova S, Lebedeva M, Trifonova A, Goryunov D, Sivolapova A, Troitsky A, et al. Identification of Informative Microsatellite Markers in the Avena Chloroplast Genome Provides New Insights into Oat Phylogeny. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 2026;95(6):14. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.077294
IEEE Style
S. Goryunova et al., “Identification of Informative Microsatellite Markers in the Avena Chloroplast Genome Provides New Insights into Oat Phylogeny,” Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot., vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 14, 2026. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2026.077294


cc Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 352

    View

  • 129

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link