Tao Liu¹, Yang Liu², Jianbin Du^1,*

The International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences, Vol.33, No.4, pp. 1-2, 2025, DOI:10.32604/icces.2025.011595

Abstract Currently, the application of the Boundary Penalty (BP) method in acoustic-structural coupled multiphysics optimization problems remains unexplored. Within the theoretical framework of BP developed previously, we address acoustic-structural coupled topology optimization problems by proposing a BP-based acoustic-structural coupled topology optimization model. A systematic solution strategy is developed to tackle the challenges encountered during model solving.
The proposed model employs a mixed u/p formulation for finite element analysis and the adjoint method for sensitivity analysis to minimize the acoustic pressure within a specified region (Fig.1 A). During optimization iterations, issues such as topological discretization and iteration oscillations… More >

Heng Cheng¹, Zebin Xing¹, Miaojuan Peng^2,*

CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, Vol.132, No.3, pp. 945-964, 2022, DOI:10.32604/cmes.2022.020755 - 27 June 2022

Abstract In this paper, we considered the improved element-free Galerkin (IEFG) method for solving 2D anisotropic steady-state heat conduction problems. The improved moving least-squares (IMLS) approximation is used to establish the trial function, and the penalty method is applied to enforce the boundary conditions, thus the final discretized equations of the IEFG method for anisotropic steady-state heat conduction problems can be obtained by combining with the corresponding Galerkin weak form. The influences of node distribution, weight functions, scale parameters and penalty factors on the computational accuracy of the IEFG method are analyzed respectively, and these numerical More >

S. Hartmann¹, R. Weyler², J. Oliver¹, J.C. Cante², J.A. Hernández¹

CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, Vol.55, No.3, pp. 211-270, 2010, DOI:10.3970/cmes.2010.055.211

Abstract This work describes a three-dimensional contact domain method for large deformation frictionless contact problems. Theoretical basis and numerical aspects of this specific contact method are given in [Oliver, Hartmann, Cante, Weyler and Hernández (2009)] and [Hartmann, Oliver, Weyler, Cante and Hernández (2009)] for two-dimensional, large deformation frictional contact problems. In this method, in contrast to many other contact formulations, the necessary contact constraints are formulated on a so-called contact domain, which can be interpreted as a fictive intermediate region connecting the potential contact surfaces of the deformable bodies. This contact domain has the same dimension More >