Open Access
ARTICLE
Photoelectric Properties of Amorphous Selenium Thin Films Deposited by Thermal Evaporation
1 Department of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Avenue, 71, Almaty, Kazakhstan
2 Kaz Graphene Limited Liability Partnership, Western str., 63, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan
3 National Research University of Electronic Technology, Shokina str., 1, Zelenograd, Moscow, Russia
* Corresponding Author: Zhandos Tolepov. Email:
Chalcogenide Letters 2026, 23(5), 1 https://doi.org/10.32604/cl.2026.081101
Received 23 February 2026; Accepted 09 May 2026; Issue published 02 June 2026
Abstract
Amorphous selenium (a-Se) thin films were deposited by vacuum thermal evaporation and investigated in planar photoconductive structures to evaluate their optical and photoelectrical properties in the low-field regime. SEM analysis showed continuous film coverage with a thickness of about 250 nm. Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction confirmed the amorphous structure of the as-deposited films and the formation of trigonal crystalline selenium after annealing. Optical analysis based on transmission and reflectance spectra yielded an optical band gapKeywords
Amorphous selenium (a-Se) is a classical photoconductive semiconductor widely used in xerography, xeroradiography, and direct-conversion X-ray detectors because of its high photoconductivity, ability to form large-area uniform thin films, and compatibility with conventional device architectures [1,2]. Thin a-Se films also remain of interest for photosensitive and optoelectronic structures, including devices operating at relatively low voltages [3,4,5].
In X-ray detectors and related photoconductive structures based on a-Se, high electric fields are typically employed, and charge transport is commonly analyzed within models developed for strong-field conditions; in such studies, typical field values are on the order of
For amorphous a-Se thin films used in planar structures with a lateral electrode configuration on the same side of the film, the influence of structural disorder should be taken into account, since the photoelectrical characteristics are determined not only by the applied field and device geometry but also by the presence of localized states in the amorphous phase [5]. Since this disorder is reflected in the optical absorption behavior, the analysis of the photoelectrical behavior of such structures can be carried out together with consideration of the optical parameters
Accordingly, the aim of this work is to investigate thermally evaporated a-Se thin films in planar photoconductive structures under low-voltage conditions by means of structural, optical, and photoelectrical characterization, including analysis of current-voltage characteristics, photocurrent, responsivity, and thermally activated transport processes, and to discuss the photoelectrical behavior in relation to the optical parameters
Thin selenium (Se) films were deposited by vacuum thermal evaporation in a high-vacuum chamber at a pressure not exceeding
The structural and phase state of the films was examined by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Raman spectra were recorded at room temperature using an NT-MDT Solver Spectrum system with
Transmission
In Eq. (1), the film thickness d was converted from nm to cm to ensure dimensional consistency. In the spectral region used for band-edge analysis, the interference fringes were not considered. The absorption coefficient α was evaluated and analyzed only in the strong-absorption region near the absorption edge, where the influence of thin-film interference on T(λ) is minimized.
The optical band gap Eg [eV] was determined using the Tauc method by linear fitting in the
For
Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics were measured at room temperature using a Tektronix PWS2326 voltage source and a Keithley 6485 picoammeter, both in the dark and under illumination. The photodetector had a planar geometry on a quartz substrate, with aluminum electrodes patterned through a mask. The interelectrode gap was
Photoelectrical measurements were performed under illumination with a 633 nm LED (central wavelength λc = 633 nm, FWHM Δλ = 21 nm, specified by the manufacturer). The power density of light
The electric field E [V/cm] was estimated as
The responsivity R [A/W] was calculated as the ratio of the photocurrent
SEM analysis showed that the as-deposited Se film formed a continuous layer without visible cracks or large agglomerates in the examined area (Fig. 1a). The cross-sectional SEM image showed that the film thickness was about
The structural and phase state of the Se films was investigated by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. As shown in Fig. 1c, the Raman spectrum of the as-deposited film is characterized by a broad band with a maximum near
To further confirm the phase state of the Se films before and after annealing, X-ray diffraction analysis was performed. As shown in Fig. 1e, the as-deposited film exhibits a broad diffuse halo characteristic of the amorphous state, indicating the absence of long-range order. In contrast, the annealed film shows distinct diffraction peaks assigned to trigonal selenium (space group P3121). The refined lattice parameters are
Figure 1: (a) Surface SEM image of the as-deposited Se film; (b) cross-sectional SEM image showing the film thickness; (c) Raman spectra of amorphous (a-Se) and crystallized (c-Se) selenium films; (d) schematic models of the amorphous network and trigonal Se lattice; (e) XRD patterns of amorphous and crystallized Se films.
Fig. 2a,b shows the transmission and reflectance spectra of the amorphous selenium (a-Se) film. In the short-wavelength region, the transmittance remains low and increases toward longer wavelengths, whereas the reflectance exhibits a weaker nonmonotonic spectral dependence. These spectra were used to calculate the absorption coefficient
Fig. 2c shows the Tauc plot in the
Fig. 2d presents the
The Urbach energy
Figure 2: Optical characterization of the amorphous selenium (a-Se) film: (a) transmission spectrum; (b) reflectance spectrum; (c) Tauc plot used for determination of the optical band gap Eg; (d) Urbach plot (ln α vs. hν) used for determination of the Urbach energy EU.
Fig. 3a,b shows the schematic of the planar a-Se photodetector and the optical image of the fabricated structure. The device has a lateral geometry with aluminum electrodes located on the same side of the quartz substrate, and the interelectrode gap is
The dark current-voltage characteristic presented in Fig. 3c is nearly linear and symmetric within the investigated voltage range. This indicates the absence of pronounced rectifying asymmetry in the contact configuration used and suggests that, within this bias range, the transport can be considered in terms of a quasi-linear response of the structure. At the same time, the absolute values of the dark current remain low, which is important for resolving the photoinduced response at low bias voltages.
Fig. 3d shows the dependence of the photocurrent on the incident light power density at
The dependences of responsivity on the electric field for different illumination levels are shown in Fig. 3e. In all cases, the responsivity increases with increasing field, which is naturally related to more efficient collection of photogenerated carriers as the field strength in the interelectrode channel increases. At the same time, the responsivity is lower at higher light power densities, which is consistent with the observed sublinear
Figure 3: (a) Schematic of the planar a-Se photodetector with Al electrodes on a quartz substrate; (b) optical image of the planar structure; (c) dark current-voltage (I-V) characteristic measured at room temperature; (d) photocurrent Iphoto as a function of incident light power density Pλ at V = 10 “V” (left axis) and responsivity R as a function of Pλ (right axis); (e) responsivity R as a function of electric field E at λ = 633 “nm” for different illumination levels.
To further clarify the low-field transport regime, temperature-dependent measurements of the dark current and the current under illumination were performed in the range 303–343 K at a fixed bias of
The observed behavior is qualitatively consistent with low-field transport in disordered amorphous selenium involving localized tail states. As the temperature increases, thermally activated release of carriers from localized states enhances the background dark conduction, in agreement with previous reports that the dark current in a-Se thin films is thermally activated above room temperature [15]. At the same time, the photoinduced current increment increases much more weakly, because trapping and recombination losses remain significant. As a result, the photoresponse contrast decreases with temperature, which is consistent with trap-assisted transport under weak electric fields.
For a more quantitative interpretation, the experimental data were analyzed in Arrhenius coordinates. Fig. 4c shows the dependences of
For the estimation of transport parameters, literature data typical of undoped amorphous selenium were used [1,2]. According to published data, the typical hole mobility is
It should be noted that the Urbach energy
Figure 4: Temperature-dependent electrical characteristics of the planar a-Se structure measured at a fixed bias of 10 V; (a) temperature dependences of the dark current Idark and the photoinduced current increment Iph; (b) temperature dependence of the ratio Iph/Idark; (c) Arrhenius plots, ln(I) versus 1000/T, for the dark current and the current under illumination.
Thus, the estimation of transport parameters together with the temperature-dependent measurements shows that, in the studied range of weak electric fields, the photoresponse of planar a-Se films is determined by the competition between the thermally activated increase in dark conduction and the limited collection of photogenerated carriers. At low fields, the drift length remains smaller than the interelectrode gap, which leads to incomplete carrier collection, whereas increasing the field improves drift collection, in agreement with the experimentally observed increase in responsivity.
In this work, planar photodetectors based on thermally evaporated amorphous selenium (a-Se) films with Al electrodes were fabricated and investigated using optical and temperature-dependent electrical measurements. Optical absorption analysis yielded an optical band gap of
The electrical measurements showed that, in the studied weak-field range, the photoresponse is governed by the competition between thermally activated dark conduction and limited collection of photogenerated carriers. Literature-based estimates of the transport parameters showed that, at low electric fields, the carrier drift length,
Temperature-dependent measurements further showed that increasing temperature enhances the dark current through thermally activated transport. As a result, the relative photoresponse decreases even though a measurable photocurrent remains present. Therefore, the performance of planar a-Se photodetectors in weak electric fields is determined by the balance between field-assisted carrier collection and temperature-induced growth of dark conduction.
Overall, the results clarify the mechanisms limiting the performance of planar a-Se photodetectors under low-field conditions. Further improvement requires increasing the effective electric field, reducing the carrier transit distance, or optimizing the device geometry to enhance carrier collection before recombination and trapping losses become dominant.
Acknowledgement:
Funding Statement: The authors received no specific funding for this study.
Author Contributions: The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: conceptualization, Zhandos Tolepov and Oleg Prikhodko; film deposition and sample preparation, Guzal Ismailova; investigation and device design, Zhadyra Toreniyaz and Nurkadam Tolep; XRD analysis, Zhasulan Nakysbekov; Raman analysis, Tilek Kuanyshbekov; optical measurements, Dmitry Terekhov. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Availability of Data and Materials: The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethics Approval: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Kasap SO , Rowlands JA . Review: X-ray photoconductors and stabilized a-Se for direct conversion digital flat-panel X-ray image detectors. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2000; 11: 179– 98. doi:10.1023/A:1008993813689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Huang H , Abbaszadeh S . Recent developments of amorphous selenium-based X-ray detectors: a review. IEEE Sens J. 2020; 20( 4): 1694– 704. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2950319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Hellier K , Swaby A , Ott J , Abbaszadeh S . Performance evaluation of an amorphous selenium photodetector at high fields for application integration. IEEE Sens J. 2023; 23( 12): 12759– 66. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2023.3273463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Al-Ani SKJ , Al-Delaimi MN , Al-Hamdani AH , Jawher HM . Optical and electrical properties of pure and doped amorphous thin selenium films. Int J Electron. 1990; 69( 1): 87– 95. doi:10.1080/00207219008920294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Tanaka K , Gotoh T . Gap states in amorphous selenium: what are the atomic structures? Phys Status Solidi B. 2025; 262( 4): 2400458. doi:10.1002/pssb.202400458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Tian J , Zhang Q , Wu L , Hao X , Zeng G , Wang W , et al. Impact of window layers on selenium distribution and photovoltaic performance in CdSexTe1−x/CdTe solar cells. Chalcogenide Lett. 2026; 23( 1): 2. doi:10.32604/cl.2026.076362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Hesabizadeh T , Subedi R , Webster TJ , Guisbiers G . Selenium nanoparticles: effect of autoclave treatment on size, shape, phase and antimicrobial properties. Chalcogenide Lett. 2024; 21( 11): 847– 54. doi:10.15251/cl.2024.2111.847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Poborchii VV , Kolobov AV , Tanaka K . An in situ Raman study of polarization-dependent photocrystallization in amorphous selenium films. Appl Phys Lett. 1998; 72( 10): 1167– 9. doi:10.1063/1.121002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Cherin P , Unger P . The crystal structure of trigonal selenium. Inorg Chem. 1967; 6( 8): 1589– 91. doi:10.1021/ic50054a037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Sharma I , Sharma P , Hassanien AS . Optical properties and optoelectrical parameters of the quaternary chalcogenide amorphous Ge15SnxS35−xTe50 films. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2022; 590: 121686. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Tauc J , Grigorovici R , Vancu A . Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. Phys Status Solidi B. 1966; 15( 2): 627– 37. doi:10.1002/pssb.19660150224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Davis EA , Mott NF . Conduction in non-crystalline systems V. Conductivity, optical absorption and photoconductivity in amorphous semiconductors. Philos Mag. 1970; 22( 179): 903– 22. doi:10.1080/14786437008221061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Özmenteş R , Hassanien AS . Characterizations and optical discussions of thermally evaporated titanium dioxide thin films. J Opt. 2025; 54( 3): 1322– 40. doi:10.1007/s12596-024-02207-z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Urbach F . The long-wavelength edge of photographic sensitivity and of the electronic absorption of solids. Phys Rev. 1953; 92( 5): 1324. doi:10.1103/physrev.92.1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Qamhieh N , Willekens J , Brinza M , Adriaenssens GJ . Anomalous DC dark conductivity behaviour in a-Se films. J Phys Condens Matter. 2003; 15( 41): L631– 7. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/15/41/L01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cite This Article
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
View Full Text
Download PDF
Downloads
Citation Tools